Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

AI in design education

Factors affecting students' professional learning adaptability

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21284040
AutoresXiang Meng (0000-0002-9696-7181, Jiangsu University), Sha Li (0000-0002-3241-0069, Jiangsu University), Kailin Wang (Jiangsu University), Xiaoqiang Sun (0000-0002-3399-7260, Jiangsu University, autor correspondente)
Ano2026
Volume266
Páginas106854
Data de publicação2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoActa Psychologica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106854
PMID42013756
OpenAlexW7154958283
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas37

Against the backdrop of accelerated reconstruction of the design-education ecosystem by artificial intelligence, this study focuses on the core issue of insufficient adaptability of design-major college students to AI-supported learning environments and examines the factors and mechanisms that influence their adaptability. Through a survey employing a questionnaire, 784 valid responses were gathered and subjected to empirical analysis using a structural equation model. The study reveals that the overall level of professional learning adaptability is moderately high. Notably, five factors-learning motivation and goals, learning self-efficacy, teacher support and teaching intervention, resource platforms and technical environment, and intelligent literacy-exert significant positive influences on professional learning adaptability. Particularly, learning motivation and goals, along with learning self-efficacy, exhibit the most substantial direct effects. Teacher support and teaching intervention indirectly bolsters adaptability by reinforcing learning motivation and self-efficacy. This study introduces and validates a novel five-factor model within the context of AI-supported design professional education. This model contributes to the theoretical underpinning of learning adaptability and furnishes empirical support for universities seeking to bolster students' adaptability through curriculum restructuring, tailored interventions, and the establishment of an intelligent education environment. Furthermore, it presents feasible strategies for advancing design education, focusing on three key areas: the synergistic stimulation of motivation and efficacy, customized interventions for diverse student cohorts, and the enhancement of the resource-literacy continuum

Adaptability · Professional development · Professional learning community · AI in Service Interactions · Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations · Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation · Human Factors and Ergonomics

  • Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses

    Yu-Chun Kuo, Andrew Walker et al.•The Internet and Higher Education•2014

  • Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom

    Open Access•Yoshija Walter•International Journal of…•2024

  • Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment.

    Martin M Chemers, Li‐tze Hu et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2001

  • Engagement Matters

    Open Access•Florence Martins, Doris U Bolliger•Online Learning•2018

  • Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Avi Besser, Gordon L Flett et al.•Scholarship of Teaching and…•2022

  • Integrating Ethics and Career Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students

    Open Access•Helen Zhang, Irene Lee et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom

    Open Access•Louis Deslauriers, Logan S McCarty et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  • Measuring adjustment to college.

    Robert W Baker, Bohdan Siryk•Journal of Counseling Psychology•1984

  • Positive psychology

    Martin E P Seligman, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi•American Psychologist•2000

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • The Evolution of Developmental Theories Since Piaget

    Open Access•Philippe Rochat•Perspectives on Psychological…•2024

  • Direct instruction or active learning? The spectrum of first-year university teaching practices

    Manuel Bächtold, Jacqueline Papet et al.•Higher Education Research &…•2024

  • Emotionally intelligent students are more engaged and successful

    Open Access•Karen C H Zhoc, Ronnel B King et al.•European Journal of Psychology of…•2020

  • Self-efficacy

    Albert Bandura•Psychological Review•1977

  • Motives for Using Facebook, Patterns of Facebook Activities, and Late Adolescents’ Social Adjustment to College

    Open Access•Chia‐chen Yang, Chia-chen Yang et al.•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2013

  • The Art of Creative Inquiry—From Question Asking to Prompt Engineering

    Open Access•Gal Sasson Lazovsky, Tuval Raz et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2025

  • Adaptability and emotional, behavioural and cognitive aspects of self-regulated learning

    Open Access•Tommaso Feraco, Nicole Casali et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2023

  • Integrative Motivation

    Open Access•R C Gardner, A-m Masgoret et al.•Language Learning•2004

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae