Decoding the social mind in depression
A computational dissociation between explicit trust and implicit belief updating
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21284072 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sara Shakeri (Alzahra University, autor correspondente), Roshanak Khodabakhsh Pirkalani (Alzahra University) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 264 |
| Páginas | 106470 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Acta Psychologica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106470 |
| PMID | 41702099 |
| OpenAlex | W7129027008 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 67 |
This study employed a computational psychiatry approach to investigate how depressive symptoms impact belief updating about others' trustworthiness across different social contexts. Using a modified Trust Game with trustworthy (75% cooperative) and untrustworthy (25% cooperative) partner conditions, we examined both explicit belief reports and implicit computational processes in 169 participants. Linear mixed-effects models revealed that higher depression scores predicted lower posterior trust beliefs uniformly across both social conditions, indicating a generalized negative updating bias. Computational modeling further demonstrated a context-dependent pattern in likelihood bias (p (O|H)), with depressive symptoms associated with reduced bias specifically in the untrustworthy partner condition. This reflects cognitive inflexibility in processing negative social evidence and reveals the computational mechanisms underlying dichotomous thinking in depression. Additionally, depression scores correlated with reduced cooperative behavior exclusively in the untrustworthy condition. These findings reveal a novel dissociation in depression: while explicit social beliefs show pervasive negativity, implicit computational biases emerge specifically in threatening social contexts, supporting theoretical frameworks that emphasize process dissociation in mood disorders. The study bridges social cognition and computational psychiatry by identifying specific computational markers of impaired belief updating in depression. • Depression consistently reduces explicit trust across all social contexts, independent of partner trustworthiness. • Computational likelihood bias in depression appears specifically during untrustworthy interactions, remaining absent in safe contexts. • Depressed individuals show cognitive inflexibility through systematic underestimation of negative behavior probability from trustworthy partners. • Social avoidance in depression emerges specifically in threatening contexts, linking computational bias to behavioral outcomes
Cognition · Computational model · Dissociation (chemistry) · Mood · Social cognition · Social decision making · Theory of mind · Trustworthiness · Child and Animal Learning Development · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
The free-energy principle
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis
A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation
The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research
Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions
Getting to Know You
Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli
Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Advances in Cognitive Theory and Therapy
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Why and When Beliefs Change
When Beliefs Face Reality
Social impression formation and depression
Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning
Trait anxiety is linked to increased usage of priors in a perceptual decision making task
The felt presence of other minds
A healthy dose of trust
The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis
Bayesian approaches to autism
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |