Coordination and Coming to Be

The following are purported to be common-sense features of the world: time’s passage, the unreality of the future, the existence of ‘genuine’ change. All of these common-sense features are accommodated by accepting the phenomenon of absolute becoming, a view of temporal passage in which the unreal future comes into existence in the present. Indeed, most philosophers who lay claim to common-sense views of time accept absolute becoming. I argue that absolute becoming has deeply unintuitive consequences. Specifically, proponents of absolute becoming face what I call the coordination problem: in the absence of a connection between the existing present and the unreal future, one must, but cannot, explain how whatever comes into existence preserves the continuing regularity of the world. The standard options to explain the continuing regularity of the world take the form of appealing to enforcers—causation, laws of nature, and dispositions—to guarantee that what comes into existence preserves these regularities. I show that the very nature of a world in which there is no future means that enforcers cannot guarantee this regular nature of the world. Absolute becoming should therefore be rejected: the future does not come into existence; it already exists

Absolute (philosophy) · Causation · Common sense · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Law and economics · Phenomenon · Sociology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

• Episodic imagining, temporal experience, and beliefs about time

  Open Access•Anthony Bigg, Andrew J Latham et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  Incluir item

• Robust passage phenomenology probably does not explain future-bias

  Open Access•Andrew J Latham, Kristie Miller et al.•Synthese•2022

  Incluir item

• A World of States of Affairs

  Open Access•D M Armstrong•World of States of Affairs•1997

  Incluir item

• What is a Law of Nature?

  Open Access•D M Armstrong•What Is a Law of Nature?•1983

  Incluir item

• The Moving Spotlight

  Ross P Cameron•Moving Spotlight•2015

  Incluir item

• Objective Becoming

  Bradford Skow•Objective Becoming•2015

  Incluir item

• Nature's Metaphysics

  Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•Nature's Metaphysics•2007

  Incluir item

• How to speak of the colors

  Open Access•Mark Johnston•Philosophical Studies•1992

  Incluir item

• The Nature of Laws

  Open Access•Michael Tooley•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1977

  Incluir item

• The Metaphysics Within Physics

  Tim Maudlin•METAPHYSICS WITHIN PHYSICS.•2007

  Incluir item

• I.—the Unreality of Time

  J Ellis McTaggart•Mind•1908

  Incluir item

• Absolute becoming, relational becoming and the arrow of time

  Open Access•Mauro Dorato•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2006

  Incluir item

• The problem of retention

  Open Access•Matthew Tugby•Synthese•2017

  Incluir item

• Does Anything Hold the Universe Together

  Open Access•Helen Beebee•Synthese•2006

  Incluir item

• Laws of Nature

  Open Access•Fred I Dretske, Fred Dretske•Philosophy of Science•1977

  Incluir item

• Interfering With Nomological Necessity

  Markus Schrenk•The Philosophical Quarterly•2011

  Incluir item

• Dispositions and Conditionals

  C B Martins, C B Martin•The Philosophical Quarterly•1994

  Incluir item

• Dispositions and Antidotes

  Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•The Philosophical Quarterly•1998

  Incluir item

• Finkish Dispositions

  David Lewis•The Philosophical Quarterly•1997

  Incluir item