What topic continuity problem
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21335128 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alexander W Kocurek (0000-0002-0912-1488, Cornell University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Fascículo | 7 |
| Páginas | 1961-1981 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-08-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2022.2126884 |
| OpenAlex | W4302028432 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 52 |
A common objection to the very idea of conceptual engineering is the topic continuity problem: whenever one tries to ‘reengineer’ a concept, one only shifts attention away from one concept to another. Put differently, there is no such thing as conceptual revision: there's only conceptual replacement. Here, I show that topic continuity is compatible with conceptual replacement. Whether the topic is preserved in an act of conceptual replacement simply depends on what is being replaced (a conceptual tool or a conceptual role) and what the topic under discussion is. Thus, the topic continuity problem only arises from a failure to specify these two things
Cognition · Conceptual Blending · Conceptual framework · Conceptual model · Conceptual schema · Epistemology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
Aboutness
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Inquisitive Semantics
Fixing Language
Conceptual Engineering, Metasemantic Externalism and Speaker-Meaning
A Pragmatic Method for Normative Conceptual Work
The Dynamics of Vagueness
Syntax and semantics of questions
Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Which Concepts Should We Use?
Questions
The revisionist's rubric
Going On, Not in the Same Way
Metalinguistic effects
Why Conceptual Engineers Should Not Worry About Topics
There is no dilemma for conceptual engineering. Reply to Max Deutsch
Speaker’s reference, stipulation, and a dilemma for conceptual engineers
How to engineer a concept
Conceptual change in perspective
Conceptual exploration
Truth and objectivity in conceptual engineering
Topic Continuity in Conceptual Engineering and Beyond
Conceptual engineering
Downplaying the change of subject objection to conceptual engineering
Topics, disputes and ‘going meta’
Verbal disputes and topic continuity
Evaluative and Metalinguistic Dispute
Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
Relevant implication
Information structure in discourse
How to have a metalinguistic dispute
The epistemic goal of a concept
Conceptual engineering, truth, and efficacy
Belief as Question‐Sensitive
Social Structures and the Ontology of Social Groups
Verbal Disputes
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |