Frege and saving substitution
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21371264 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Bryan Pickel (0000-0002-5686-8429, University of Glasgow), Brian Rabern (0000-0002-3987-1853, University of Edinburgh, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 178 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 2687-2697 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-08-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11098-020-01576-y |
| OpenAlex | W3093465906 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 12 |
Goodman and Lederman (Philos Stud 177(4):947–952, 2020) argue that the traditional Fregean strategy for preserving the validity of Leibniz’s Law of substitution fails when confronted with apparent counterexamples involving proper names embedded under propositional attitude verbs. We argue, on the contrary, that the Fregean strategy succeeds and that Goodman and Lederman’s argument misfires
Argument (complex analysis) · Counterexample · Discrete mathematics · Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Propositional formula · Propositional variable · Substitution (logic) · Artificial Intelligence · Chemistry · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Altamente citado | Não |