The gendered effects of #MeToo and nondisclosure agreements on workplace social capital in the United States
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21381566 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sarah F Small (0000-0002-7458-9212, University of Utah, autor correspondente), Laura Beltran Figueroa (0009-0001-7659-6053, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-33 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-04-26 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Review of Social Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00346764.2026.2656878 |
| OpenAlex | W7156244524 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 55 |
The #MeToo movement sparked changes in the social structures of workplaces and in legislation. In this paper, we use American Time Use Survey data from 2003 to 2023 alongside Google Trends and state legislative data to examine how #MeToo affected workers’ daily minutes spent socializing with bosses, coworkers, and clients and whether state laws restricting nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) related to workplace harassment or discrimination shaped these patterns. We find that in the aftermath of #MeToo, men spent more time in these work-related social interactions, while women show no comparable increase and, if anything, a small decline. This pattern is consistent with increased gender segregation in workplace social-capital building activities. Using staggered difference-in-differences, we show that NDA restrictions did not change women’s social time in a consistent way, suggesting the legislation did not have the same gendered effects on social capital accumulation
Capital (architecture) · Social capital · Social reproduction · Work (physics) · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Labor Movements and Unions · Work-Family Balance Challenges
Predicting the Present with Google Trends
Tobit or not Tobit?
Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Social campaigns to social change? Sexual violence framing in U.S. news before and after #metoo
Non-disclosure Agreements
Who Pays for the Kids
Estimating the Effect of Treatments Allocated by Randomized Waiting Lists
What's in a Relationship? An Examination of Social Capital, Race and Class in Mentoring Relationships
Women non‐traditional entrepreneurs and social capital
Gender and the Limits of Social Capital
The murder of knowledge and the ghosts that remain
The social psychological predictors of men’s backlash responses to the #MeToo movement
Backlash against the #MeToo movement
Intersectionality and quantitative methods
Has the Feminist Economics Intellectual Project Lost its Way? An Analysis of the Journal’s Evolution
Gender Gaps in Social Capital
The Early Impact of Covid-19 on Job Losses among Black Women in the United States
Gender Differences in Immigrant Assimilation Activities in the US
Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo
MeToo or #MenToo? Expressions of Backlash and Masculinity Politics in the #MeToo Era
Management, Women and Gender Capital
Impressing for Success
Covid‐19 and the gender gap in work hours
Social media and hyper‐masculine work cultures
The significance of feminist infrastructure
A feminist perspective on Covid‐19 and the value of care work globally
A trade of one's own”
Clergy, capital, and gender inequality
Silence‐breaking butterfly effect
Networking behaviors and career outcomes
Supergirl and the Corporate Articulation of Neoliberal Feminism
Immigrant Women and the Covid-19 Pandemic
MeToo and Intersectionality
MeToo and the Politics of Social Change
Social capital, gender and careers
Gender, Children, and Social Contact
Social Space and Symbolic Power
Mentors as Social Capital
A Conversation with Susan Faludi on Backlash, Trumpism, and #MeToo
| Altamente citado | Não |
|---|