Subnational governments, populism, and public health policy
The role of Brazilian states during the Covid-19 pandemic
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21381975 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Frederico Bertholini (0000-0002-2480-739X, Universidade de Brasília), Michelle Vieira Fernandez (0000-0003-0224-0991, Universidade de Brasília), Barbara Maia (0000-0002-7127-2498, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte), Alexandra Novais (0000-0001-6868-9922, Universidade de Brasília), Bruno Soares (0009-0009-9302-328X, Universidade de Brasília) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Revista de Administração Pública (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0034-7612 • E-ISSN: 1982-3134 |
| Editora | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-761220250038x |
| OpenAlex | W7140986181 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0034-76122025000600206 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
This study examines the influence of political alignment between state governors and President Jair Bolsonaro on public health spending regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Using an original dataset of executive orders issued by state governments from February 2020 to October 2021, we analyze spending-related health regulations and their variation according to governors’ political affiliations. The results indicate that governors aligned with the federal government issued significantly fewer spending regulations, particularly in 2021, compared to their non-aligned counterparts. This pattern suggests that normative inaction was not a consequence of institutional constraints but a deliberate political strategy to avoid contradicting the federal government’s denialist stance. Negative binomial regression and mixed-effects models confirm that political incentives rather than health-related needs shaped regulation production. These findings support the theory of “policy non-design” and the broader literature on democratic backsliding, demonstrating how populist leaders and their allies use inaction as a strategic tool to evade accountability. The study contributes to the understanding of competitive federalism under populist governments and its implications for policymaking in times of crisis
Federalism · Government (linguistics) · Incentive · Normative · Pandemic · Politics · Public health · State (computer science) · Policy Transfer and Learning · Politics and Society in Latin America · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
“ They Did It”
Covid-19 and public-sector capacity
Descentralização e coordenação federativa
Federalismo e políticas de saúde no Brasil
Contexto de elaboração do Plano de Imunização contra Covid-19 no Brasil
Populism unrestrained
Inequalities and the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil
Mobilizing Policy (In)Capacity to Fight Covid-19
Social policy in the face of a global pandemic
Políticas de Saúde dos Estados Brasileiros Durante a Pandemia de Covid-19
Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism
Populists in Power
As relações intergovernamentais durante a pandemia da Covid-19 no Brasil
How to Perform Crisis
Vacina contra Covid-19
A coordenação federativa no Brasil
Fórum
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |