Favored outgroup can eliminate the ingroup reference effect
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21391787 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Qiong Li (0000-0002-5658-9614, School of Humanities and Foreign Languages Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications Xi'an China), Ting Liang (0000-0003-3783-4191, School of Education Science Xinjiang Teacher’s College Urumqi China), Chunyan Cao (College of Education Science Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University Xi'an China), Xiaobin Zhang (0000-0001-9129-7425, School of Psychology Shaanxi Normal University Xi'an China, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 871-877 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjop.12767 |
| PMID | 34289141 |
| OpenAlex | W3184961507 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
Studies have found that, consistent with the ingroup favoritism effect, the recollection of ingroup related information is better than that of outgroup related information. This study explores whether preferred outgroup can eliminate the ingroup reference effect. Using the university as the reference group, Experiment 1 was designed to verify the group reference effect when there was no outgroup favoritism, and Experiment 2 examined the impact of outgroup favoritism on the group‐reference effect. Experiment 1 found that recognition rates in the ingroup‐reference condition were significantly higher than in the outgroup reference condition. Experiment 2 found no significant difference between recognition rates in the ingroup‐ reference and outgroup‐reference conditions. Using household registration to classify the reference group, Experiment 3 recruited participants from rural areas to verify the group‐reference effect while Experiment 4 recruited students from rural areas with a preference toward urban areas to explore the impact of outgroup favoritism on the group‐reference effect. The results are the same as those in the Experiment 1 and Experiment 2. These findings suggest that the ingroup reference effect disappears when outgroups are preferred groups
In-group favoritism · Ingroups and outgroups · Outgroup · Social group · Social identity theory · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The Influence of One's Own Body Weight on Implicit and Explicit Anti‐fat Bias
Subgroup Prejudice Based on Skin Color Among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America
Minority Members' Implicit Attitudes
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Measures of Implicit Attitudes May Conceal Differences in Implicit Associations
Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site
An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
Social Identity
Self-Reference Effect and the Group-Reference Effect in the Recall of Shared and Unshared Information in Nominal Groups and Interacting Groups
Self‐reference and group membership
On the robustness of the group reference effect
Children's inclusion of the group in the self
Non-conscious forms of system justification
White and Black American children's implicit intergroup bias
Simultaneous ingroup and outgroup favoritism in implicit social cognition
A Decade of System Justification Theory
Sticking together or falling apart
Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies
Relational Self Versus Collective Self
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Implicit Outgroup Favoritism and Intergroup Judgment
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |