Assessing the Validity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 as a Measure of HiTOP Spectra

Identifying the Optimal Placement of the Anankastia Factor

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21391881
AutoresLucas De Francisco Carvalho (0000-0002-3274-9724, Department of Psychology Universidade São Francisco Campinas Brazil, autor correspondente), Gisele Magarotto Machado (0000-0003-1983-6636, Department of Psychology Universidade São Francisco Campinas Brazil), Milena Nikolic (0000-0003-0033-7044, University of Oslo Oslo Norway), Giselle Pianowski (0000-0003-4400-7151, Department of Psychology Universidade São Francisco Campinas Brazil), Cato Grønnerød (0000-0001-7915-9601, University of Oslo Oslo Norway)
Ano2026
Volume67
Fascículo2
Páginas334-351
Data de publicação2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.70035
PMID41122820
OpenAlexW4415469225
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas58

This is a cross‐sectional study investigating the validity of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP‐2) as a tool for assessing HiTOP spectra. In Study 1, a nonclinical sample of 1659 Brazilian participants (65.4% females, with ages ranging from 18 to 70 years) was utilized to evaluate the internal structure of the IDCP‐2 and its alignment with the HiTOP framework, according to four experts' independent ratings. Given the disparities in expert ratings regarding the conscientiousness scales of IDCP‐2, we conducted exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to identify the optimal placement for the anankastia factor within our model. Study 2 involved 641 nonclinical participants (87.17% females, with ages ranging from 18 to 82 years) and examined the external validity of the IDCP‐2 factors that are shown to be representative of the HiTOP spectra by correlating its scales with the PID5BF + M domains. The findings indicate the IDCP‐2's robust internal consistency and factorial validity as a tool for assessing the HiTOP spectra and confirming its external validity based on the significant moderate to high correlations with the PID5BF + M domain. Additionally, our results suggest anankastia to be a separate sixth factor within the HiTOP framework. These results underscore the IDCP‐2's value in capturing a wide range of pathological traits, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of personality and psychopathology. Future research should focus on further validating the IDCP‐2 in clinically diverse populations, to enhance its clinical applicability according to global healthcare developments, and to support the broader implementation of the HiTOP model globally

Big Five personality traits · Concurrent validity · Conscientiousness · Exploratory factor analysis · Incremental validity · Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Predictive validity · Psychometrics · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications