Utilitarian or Deontological? The Effect of Solving Distant Analogies on Moral Judgments

Analogical reasoning involves mapping relational structure from a source domain to a target domain. Distant analogies, compared with near analogies, require reasoners to go beyond surface similarity and extract deeper relational structure. Because utilitarian judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas also involve evaluating structural trade‐offs between costs and benefits, the present study examined whether solving distant analogies increases approval of utilitarian actions. In Experiment 1, 175 Chinese university students were randomly assigned to solve either 40 distant or 40 near verbal analogies and then rated their approval of utilitarian actions across eight sacrificial moral dilemmas. In Experiment 2, 161 students completed the same procedure, except that the dilemmas were rewritten from a second‐person to a third‐person perspective. Across both experiments, participants in the distant‐analogy condition reported significantly higher approval of utilitarian actions than those in the near‐analogy condition. This effect remained significant after controlling for analogy accuracy in linear mixed‐effects models, and the Condition × Accuracy interactions were not significant in either experiment. These findings suggest that solving distant analogies can increase subsequent utilitarian approval in sacrificial moral dilemmas, possibly by promoting a relational, structure‐focused processing orientation

Analogical reasoning · Analogy · Domain specificity · Moral dilemma · Moral reasoning · Similarity (geometry) · Child and Animal Learning Development · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

• Revisiting External Validity

  Open Access•Christopher W Bauman, A Peter Mcgraw et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2014

  Incluir item

• Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment

  Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2008

  Incluir item

• G*Power 3

  Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  Incluir item

• An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

  Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Science•2001

  Incluir item

• Achieving abstraction

  Caren M Walker, Samantha Q Hubachek et al.•Developmental Psychology•2018

  Incluir item

• Psychological distance increases uncompromising consequentialism

  Open Access•Pilar Aguilar, Silvina Brussino et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  Incluir item

• Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures

  Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021

  Incluir item

• Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making

  Paul Conway, Bertram Gawronski•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  Incluir item