Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How to separate coordinate and categorical spatial relation components in integrated spatial representations

A new methodology for analysing sketch maps

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21392078
AutoresAntonella Lopez (0000-0002-3717-1677, Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology, Communication University of Study Bari Bari Italy, autor correspondente), Alessandro O Caffò (0000-0003-3973-8152, Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology, Communication University of Study Bari Bari Italy), Albert Postma (0000-0003-4260-7807, Experimental Psychology Helmholtz Institute Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands), Anthony Bosco (0000-0002-9458-3993, Department of Educational Sciences, Psychology, Communication University of Study Bari Bari Italy)
Ano2020
Volume61
Fascículo5
Páginas607-615
Data de publicação2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoScandinavian Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0036-5564 • E-ISSN: 1467-9450
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjop.12633
PMID32293035
OpenAlexW3016147534
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas57

Spatial relations between landmarks can be represented by means of categories and coordinates. In the present research, this paradigm was applied to sketch maps based on information acquired in goal‐directed behaviour of exploration of a university campus area. The first aim was to investigate whether categorical and coordinate information can be considered conceptually independent in sketch maps. The second aim was to assess which kind of distance measure served better to represent coordinate information in the present case study, and finally to assess the factorial structure of coordinate and categorical data. Analytic methodology as well as statistical analysis were found to confirm that separating coordinate and categorical components was formally as well as empirically appropriate. A series of confirmatory factor analyses showed the best fit for the model with two correlated components, as well as an acceptable reliability of measures emerged. The two components were moderately correlated. Moreover, the adoption of Manhattan distance seemed to be the most effective method to represent coordinate spatial relations in spatial sketch maps of areas acquired through navigation

Algorithm · Categorical variable · Coordinate system · Data mining · Factorial · Machine learning · Pattern recognition (psychology) · Relation (database) · Sketch · Spatial analysis · Spatial relation · Statistics · Artificial Intelligence · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Mathematics · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

  • The Prevalence of Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Its Association with Different Lifestyle Factors in a South Italian Elderly Population

    Open Access•Alessandro O Caffò, Giuseppina Spano et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • The Road More Travelled

    Open Access•Antonella Lopez, Alessandro Germani et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Where Are Landscape Designers' Spatial Abilities in the Brain? An fMRI Study

    Open Access•Shih-Han Hung, Chia-Yi Huang et al.•Journal of People, Plants, and…•2023

  • Spatial Relationship Analysis of Geographic Elements in Sketch Maps at the Meso and Micro Spatial Scales

    Open Access•Chen Zhang, Ming Tang et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2024

  • Top-down modulation on depth processing

    Open Access•Ke Zhang, Jiehui Qian•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2023

  • The impact of age and familiarity with the environment on categorical and coordinate spatial relation representations

    Open Access•Maureen C Ashe, Antonella Lopez et al.•Scandinavian Journal of Psychology•2021

  • Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) Estimation Procedures

    Open Access•Diana Mîndrilă•International Journal for Digital…•2010

  • Factor Analysis with Ordinal Indicators

    Carlos G Forero, Alberto Maydeu‐olivare et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2009

  • Structural Equation Modeling

    Jodie B Ullman•Journal of Personality Assessment•2006

  • Reliability from α to ω

    Open Access•William Revelle, David M Condon•Psychological Assessment•2019

  • “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition

    Open Access•Barbara Landau, Ray Jackendoff•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1993

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano1,2
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2024 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae