Nocebo effects on motor performance

Directionally opposite to placebo effects are the nocebo effects that negatively impact people’s thoughts, feelings, and actions. An important but scarcely studied aspect of everyday functioning is motor performance, in which nocebo effects might impair athletic skills and the much‐needed purposeful daily movements and motor actions. The aim of this literature review is to unveil the nocebo effects on motor performance. Searched databases were PubMed, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. Twenty‐one articles, reporting 23 studies, met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the current review. All reports exhibited “some” risk of bias. Of the 23 studies, 14 found a nocebo effect on motor performance, equivocal results emerged from two studies, and negative findings were reported in seven studies. Most (10/12) studies using a between‐subjects design have reported a nocebo effect. The mean effect size was 0.60, suggesting a medium‐to‐large effect of nocebo intervention on motor performance. Based on this review, we conclude that nocebo effects do influence motor performance and can be evoked with negative verbal information. This effect may be more robust than the placebo effect but also depends on the type of motor performance, on the examined sample, and on the nocebo agent. Hence, nocebo effects should be recognized and controlled in empirical research on motor performance, and they should be prevented or extinguished in practical and therapeutic settings. More extensive examination of the nocebo effect on motor performance is warranted, especially using between‐subjects research design and a “no agent” control condition

• The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

  Open Access•Julian P T Higgins, D G Altman et al.•BMJ•2011

  Incluir item

• Estimating Effect Sizes From Pretest-Posttest-Control Group Designs

  Open Access•Scott B Morris•Organizational Research Methods•2008

  Incluir item

• Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

  David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•Physical Therapy•2009

  Incluir item

• The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions

  Open Access•A Liberati, D G Altman et al.•BMJ•2009

  Incluir item

• RoB 2

  Open Access•Jonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.•BMJ•2019

  Incluir item

• "Voodoo" Death

  Walter B Cannon•Psychosomatic Medicine•1957

  Incluir item

• Placebo- and Nocebo-Effects in Cognitive Neuroenhancement

  Open Access•Alexander Winkler, Christiane Hermann•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2019

  Incluir item

• Expectancy and apparent duration as determinants of fatigue

  Melvin L Snyder, Melvin Snyder et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1974

  Incluir item

• The Placebo Effect

  Steve Stewart‐william, Steve Stewart-William et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2004

  Incluir item