Beginning with the end in mind
Meaningful and intentional endings to equitable partnerships in science education
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21392850 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Stephany Santos (0000-0002-4322-3517, Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut USA), Déana Scipio (0000-0002-0499-0529, IslandWood Graduate Program Bainbridge Island Washington USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 106 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 1214-1231 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-09-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21752 |
| OpenAlex | W4289869402 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
This paper is one of three sequential papers interrogating equity in partnerships (or partnering relationships [PRs]) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. In this piece, we prioritize abundance framing and dignity‐conferring work when engaging in partnerships with and for communities who have been historically marginalized. We propose a framework of seven drivers that define the directions and/or success of PRs: (1) mission, vision, or values; (2) goals or outcomes; (3) practices or processes; (4) power, privilege, or oppression; (5) communities and geography; (6) time and urgency; and (7) partners. This framework can be used to examine PRs at any phase of their existence to ensure equity‐centered and dignity‐conferring processes and outcomes. We discuss case studies that are common or specific challenges or frustrations that occur in nonequity‐centered PRs. We frame these as six vexations: (1) sustainable PRs; (2) dignity‐conferring PRs; (3) repetitive PRs; (4) political PRs; (5) “mission trip” PRs; (6) and deceptive PRs. We address these by using a data feminist lens (a perspective inspired by the book Data Feminism that centers on justice in defining and presenting outcomes), and future dreamings (a perspective that centers on potential ahead) to define our suggestions for designing intentional endings of partnerships
Dignity · Empowerment · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Equity (law) · Feminism · Framing (construction) · General partnership · Oppression · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Science education · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Engineering · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · Service-Learning and Community Engagement · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Data Feminism
More than Tuskegee
Learning to Feel Like a Scientist
Participatory Design Research and Educational Justice
Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context
Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research
Weapons of Math Destruction
Ubuntu considered in light of exclusion of people with disabilities
Design-Based Research
Claiming Credit
Investigating the Relationship between School Counselor Recommendations and Student Cultural Behavioral Styles
Pedagogy of the oppressed
Decolonizing Methodologies
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Altamente citado | Não |