Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Daring to doubt! Shaftesbury, doubt, and polite conversation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21395099
AutoresSean Maroney (0009-0000-6801-2356, Department of Philosophy King's College London London UK, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Volume63
Fascículo2
Páginas192-210
Data de publicação2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Southern Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0038-4283 • E-ISSN: 2041-6962
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sjp.12621
OpenAlexW4408385407
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas21

Shaftesbury thought that dogmatism was an epistemic vice that violated the norms of good inquiry by inhibiting the proper exercise of reason. One way that Shaftesbury attempted to defend against dogmatic thought and culture was to recommend that society followed the norms of what he called “polite conversation.” This notion has received a fair amount of scholarship. However, it was not Shaftesbury's only recommendation. The earl accused his contemporaries of being “too lazy and effeminate, and withal a little too cowardly, to dare doubt!” (C 2.108). In so doing, Shaftesbury endorsed doubt. But just what does Shaftesbury mean by this endorsement? What is doubt? Why should we doubt? Under what conditions should we doubt? This article takes seriously Shaftesbury's invocation to doubt and develops an account of doubt that fits systematically within Shaftesbury's social, ethical, epistemic project. Doubt, for Shaftesbury, is an attitude that inoculates against dogmatism much like polite conversation is an activity that inoculates against dogmatic exchange. This article argues that Shaftesbury endorses doubt because it (1) promotes genuine inquiry and (2) motivates polite conversation, which itself tends to produce epistemically good outcomes

Conversation · Epistemology · Linguistics · Politeness · Political science · Reasonable Doubt · Scholarship · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment

  • True Enough

    Catherine Z Elgin•True Enough•2017

  • Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness

    Open Access•Lawrence E Klein•Shaftesbury and the Culture of…•1994

  • Suspended judgment

    Open Access•Jane Friedman•Philosophical Studies•2013

  • The Philosophical Writings of Descartes

    Open Access•René Descartes, Eugenio Garin et al.•Philosophical Writings of Descartes•1985

  • Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles

    Open Access•C Thi Nguyen•EPISTÉMÈ•2018

  • Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression

    Kristie Dotson•Social Epistemology•2014

  • The Epistemology of Resistance

    José Medina•The epistemology of resistance•2013

  • Shaftesbury's Identification of the Good With the Beautiful

    John Andrew Bernstein•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1977

  • Natural Conversation Set in View

    Jack Prostko•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1989

  • The Third Earl of Shaftesbury and the Progress of Politeness

    Lawrence E Klein, Lawrence Klein•Eighteenth-Century Studies•1984

  • Racial Violence, Emotional Friction, and Epistemic Activism

    José Medina•Angelaki•2019

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae