Syntactic Variations in Referential Metonymy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21398813 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Zhen Wu (0000-0003-3655-1069, Department of English Shandong University 5 Hongjialou Jinan 250100 China, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-28 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Studia Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0039-3193 • E-ISSN: 1467-9582 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/stul.12243 |
| OpenAlex | W4400487311 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
This paper explores the syntactic variations of concord in sentences involving referential metonymy in English. Apart from the standard type in which syntactic agreement is shown between the metonymic NP and the verbs or pronouns that follow, this article also discusses and summarizes other types where there are various degrees of disagreement. Moreover, this paper formalizes the principles of Ruiz de Mendoza and Díez (2004) by introducing the metonymic function, and proposes simplification of these principles based on the notion of metonymy as a contingency. Finally, this paper discusses other possible factors – both contextual and non‐contextual – that may lead to these syntactic variations
Linguistics · Metaphor · Metonymy · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Lexicography and Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Psychology
The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics
Metonymy
Movement and Silence
Simpler Syntax
Mental Spaces
Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast
Transfers of Meaning
Metonymy
Metonymy as a prototypical category
Reference-point constructions
The Syntactic Phenomena of English
Fusion of functions
Adjectival inflection and the licensing of empty categories in DP
Metonymy and the grammar
On the Nature of Merge
Linguistic categorization
Lexical Categories
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |