Yulara and Future Expert Reports in Native Title Cases
A section devoted to issues in Applied Anthropology
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2144265 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Basil Sansom (DigitalSpace (United States), autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2007 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 71-92 |
| Data de publicação | 2007-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Anthropological Forum (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0066-4677 • E-ISSN: 1469-2902 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00664670601168575 |
| OpenAlex | W2144573879 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 11 |
| Referências citadas | 14 |
Australia's Native Title Act (Cth) allows Indigenous Australians to lay claims to traditional country located on unalienated Crown land. The Act also admits claims to compensation for the loss of traditional country that has been appropriated and made subject to freehold or other forms of tenure. The Yulara case discussed here was historically important. It was the first case mounted to determine appropriate compensation for the extinguishment of native title. In a compensation claim, the Indigenous applicants must first establish that (taken together) they are both (i) the rightful heirs to ancestral holders of native title and (ii) that they still maintain the traditions and customs of their forebears (phase 1). Once their holding of native title has been established at law, the applicants may then enter their claim to monetary compensation for the ‘extinguishment’ of their native title over designated lands (phase 2). In the Yulara case, it was found that the applicants were not constituted as a group of recognisable native title holders whose rights to country were rooted in those traditional laws and customs that obtained when the Yulara lands were officially brought under the dominion of British authorities ‘at sovereignty’ (1824). The case could not, therefore, proceed to a hearing of the compensation phase. Eight issues concerning the proper performance of the anthropologist as expert witness in native title matters were raised by the trial judge in the Yulara case. This paper deals with the bearing of the judge's observations on those anthropological representations that may be made in future native title cases
Compensation (psychology) · Dominion · Ethnology · Extinguishment · Freehold · Indigenous · Native american · Political science · Sociology · Sovereignty · Stewardship (theology) · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law in Society and Culture
The Dialectal Tribe and the Doctrine of Continuity
Activism through anthropological practice in the Global South
Australian Native Title Anthropology
Traffic‐habits and local descent groups
L'anthropologie au tribunal. Les revendications foncières des Aborigènes en Australie
Native Title Research in Australian Anthropology
Indigenous-settler relations at work in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park's tourism industry
Anthropology in Australian Indigenous Legal Cases
From Descent, to Multiple Pathways, to Descent
Identifying the Relevant Level of a Society in Australian Native Title Claims
Western Desert and Native Title
White man got no dreaming
Native Title in Australia
Suicide
Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self
Available Light
The Brief Reach of History and the Limitation of Recall in Traditional Aboriginal Societies and Cultures
The Landowners in the Northern Division of the Aranda Tribe, Central Australia
The Concept of ‘The Tribe’ in the Western Desert of Australia. 1
Kinship in South Australia
Aboriginal Territorial Organization
Social Theory and Social Structure
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,58 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2025 (19) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |