Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks

Analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21443528
AutoresAnahita Hajibabaei (Concordia University), Andrea Schiffauerova (0000-0003-3349-3991, Concordia University), Ashkan Ebadi (0000-0002-4542-9105, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, autor correspondente)
Ano2023
Volume128
Fascículo2
Páginas1219-1240
Data de publicação2023-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-022-04601-5
OpenAlexW4311696862
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas54

Scientific collaboration in almost every discipline is mainly driven by the need of sharing knowledge, expertise, and pooled resources. Science is becoming more complex which has encouraged scientists to involve more in collaborative research projects in order to better address the challenges. As a highly interdisciplinary field with a rapidly evolving scientific landscape, artificial intelligence calls for researchers with special profiles covering a diverse set of skills and expertise. Understanding gender aspects of scientific collaboration is of paramount importance, especially in a field such as artificial intelligence that has been attracting large investments. Using social network analysis, natural language processing, and machine learning and focusing on artificial intelligence publications for the period from 2000 to 2019, in this work, we comprehensively investigated the effects of several driving factors on acquiring key positions in scientific collaboration networks through a gender lens. It was found that, regardless of gender, scientific performance in terms of quantity and impact plays a crucial part in possessing the “social researcher” role in the network. However, subtle differences were observed between female and male researchers in acquiring the “local influencer” role

Data science · Field (mathematics) · Key (lock) · Knowledge management · Set (abstract data type) · Social media · Social network analysis · Sociology · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Same gender, shorter distance

    Open Access•Yukai Wang, Yutao Sun et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • The evolutionary mechanism of artificial intelligence industry collaboration networks

    Open Access•Jianlin Lyu, Bin Hu et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Chatbots and Empowerment in Gender-Based Violence

    Open Access•Miluska Odely Rodríguez-Saavedra, Erick Alexander Donayre Prado et al.•Social Sciences•2025

  • Gender differences in research collaboration

    Open Access•Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo et al.•Journal of Informetrics•2013

  • The gender gap in science

    Open Access•Luke Holman, Devi Stuart-Fox et al.•PLOS Biology•2018

  • Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations

    Open Access•A L Barabási, H Jeong et al.•Physica A Statistical Mechanics…•2002

  • Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration

    Open Access•Donna J Wood, Barbara Gray•The Journal of Applied Behavioral…•1991

  • Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars

    Open Access•Alireza Abbasi, Jörn Altmann et al.•Journal of Informetrics•2011

  • From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees

    Open Access•Scott M Lundberg, Scott Lundberg et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2020

  • What is research collaboration?

    Open Access•J Sylvan Katz, Ben R Martin•Research Policy•1997

  • Collaboration and Team Science

    Open Access•L Michelle Bennett, Howard Gadlin•Journal of Investigative Medicine•2012

  • Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations

    Open Access•Wolfgang Glänzel•Scientometrics•2001

  • Scientific collaboration

    Open Access•Diane H Sonnenwald•Annual Review of Information…•2007

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • Science behind AI

    Open Access•Sha Yuan, Zhou Shao et al.•Scientometrics•2020

  • Athena Unbound

    Open Access•Henry Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor et al.•Athena Unbound•2000

  • Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

    Open Access•Linton C Freeman•Social Networks•1978

  • Centrality and network flow

    Open Access•P Borgatti, Stephen P Borgatti•Social Networks•2005

  • Independence and Cooperation in Research

    M F Fox, Catherine A Faver•The Journal of Higher Education•1984

  • Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets

    Nick Crossley, Elisa Bellotti et al.•Social Network Analysis for…•2015

  • Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia

    Katrina Mary Uhly, Laura M Visser et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2015

  • The Matthew Effect in Science, II

    Robert Κ Merton, Robert K Merton•Isis•1988

  • The Knowledge-Shaping Process

    Open Access•Eric Bonds•Critical Sociology•2011

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano3
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae