Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks
Analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21443528 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anahita Hajibabaei (Concordia University), Andrea Schiffauerova (0000-0003-3349-3991, Concordia University), Ashkan Ebadi (0000-0002-4542-9105, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 1219-1240 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Scientometrics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-022-04601-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4311696862 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 54 |
Scientific collaboration in almost every discipline is mainly driven by the need of sharing knowledge, expertise, and pooled resources. Science is becoming more complex which has encouraged scientists to involve more in collaborative research projects in order to better address the challenges. As a highly interdisciplinary field with a rapidly evolving scientific landscape, artificial intelligence calls for researchers with special profiles covering a diverse set of skills and expertise. Understanding gender aspects of scientific collaboration is of paramount importance, especially in a field such as artificial intelligence that has been attracting large investments. Using social network analysis, natural language processing, and machine learning and focusing on artificial intelligence publications for the period from 2000 to 2019, in this work, we comprehensively investigated the effects of several driving factors on acquiring key positions in scientific collaboration networks through a gender lens. It was found that, regardless of gender, scientific performance in terms of quantity and impact plays a crucial part in possessing the “social researcher” role in the network. However, subtle differences were observed between female and male researchers in acquiring the “local influencer” role
Data science · Field (mathematics) · Key (lock) · Knowledge management · Set (abstract data type) · Social media · Social network analysis · Sociology · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Gender differences in research collaboration
The gender gap in science
Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration
Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
What is research collaboration?
Collaboration and Team Science
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration
National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations
Scientific collaboration
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Science behind AI
Athena Unbound
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Centrality and network flow
Independence and Cooperation in Research
Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets
Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia
The Matthew Effect in Science, II
The Knowledge-Shaping Process
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |