Scrolling and hyperlinks
The effects of two prevalent digital features on children's digital reading comprehension
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21444729 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Klaudia KRENCA (0000-0002-5845-967X, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada, autor correspondente), Emily P Taylor (0000-0001-5888-7239, Dalhousie University), Emily Taylor (0000-0001-5170-3249, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada), Hélène Deacon (0000-0002-4792-5137, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 269-291 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Research in Reading (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0141-0423 • E-ISSN: 1467-9817 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9817.12468 |
| OpenAlex | W4401436923 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
Background This study examined how children's ability to understand what they read on screens is impacted by two specific digital features: hovering hyperlinks and scrolling. Methods The participants were 75 English‐speaking children ( M = 9.90 years, SD = 0.90 years) in Grades 3 to 5 who participated in an online research study. Using a within‐participants design, children read standardised passages from the Gates–MacGinitie Reading Tests (MacGinitie et al., 2000) and answered multiple‐choice comprehension questions. In one condition, passages were presented without digital features referred to as the clicking condition; in another, children had to scroll to navigate through the passages, in a third, there were hyperlinks that provided a word definition when a participant hovered their cursor over a blue and underlined word, and a final condition included both scrolling and hyperlinks. Results As expected, there was a significant main effect of grade on children's ability to understand what they read, with better performance for children in Grade 5 than 3. Critically, there was a significant main effect of condition on children's performance on the reading comprehension questions, with higher scores for the condition with no digital features compared with the conditions with hovering hyperlinks and both scrolling and hovering hyperlinks. Performance was similar between the clicking and scrolling conditions. There was no significant interaction between grade and condition, showing consistency in effects across the upper elementary school years. Conclusions These findings could inform the optimal design of digital texts by identifying digital features that do and do not interfere with reading comprehension, with hyperlinks providing word level information interfering and scrolling having no negative impacts
Comprehension · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Hyperlink · Linguistics · Multimedia · Reading (process) · Reading comprehension · Scrolling · Web page · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Child Development and Digital Technology · Computer Science · Gender and Technology in Education · Library Collection Development and Digital Resources · Psychology
What we have learned about learning to read in a digital age and children's contemporary reading experiences
Turning back the page on digital literacy
Digital-Age Youth’s Reading Practices, Online Activities, and Metacognitive Assumptions About Learning / Prácticas de lectura, actividades en línea y supuestos metacognitivos de los jóvenes sobre el aprendizaje en la era digital
Reading on Paper and Digitally
Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper
Cognitive load in hypertext reading
Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks
Impact of the Covid-19 virus outbreak on movement and play behaviours of Canadian children and youth
Reading behavior in the digital environment
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Don't throw away your printed books
G*Power 3
No Negative Effects of Reading on Screen on Comprehension of Narrative Texts Compared to Print
Reader, come home
The shallows. What internet is doing to our brains
Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen
Literary Reading on Paper and Screens
Toward a Multifaceted Heuristic of Digital Reading to Inform Assessment, Research, Practice, and Policy
Literacy
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Know what? How digital technologies undermine learning and remembering
English Reading Within the French Immersion Program
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |