How generative AI affordance drives users’ continuous usage intention
The mediation role of self-expansion and self-extension
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21452575 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yingying Du (0000-0002-2081-2757, Zhengzhou University), Yun Liu (0000-0001-7384-1351, China University of Petroleum, East China, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Páginas | 1-16 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Behaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0144929x.2025.2601075 |
| OpenAlex | W4417245542 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 63 |
The swift advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is a key component of contemporary technological progress. Diverse generative AI tools are continually emerging and finding widespread application across numerous industries. Furthermore, individuals are increasingly exposed to and utilising these technologies. Nevertheless, the question of which technical attribute factors influence individuals’ intentions for continuous usage of generative AI remains unanswered in current research. Drawing from the affordance actualisation theory, this study focused on large language models (LLMs), a special type of generative AI tool, and formulated a theoretical framework delineating how affordances of generative AI impact users’ intentions for continuous usage, validated through the PLS-SEM method. The study reveals that the data capture, classification, delegation, and social affordances of generative AI have a positive impact on users’ self-expansion and self-extension. Self-expansion and self-extension in turn positively influenced users’ continuous usage intentions. Furthermore, data capture, classification, delegation, and social affordances exhibit significant indirect effects on users’ continuous usage intentions, mediated by two parallel factors: self-expansion and self-extension. This discovery contributes to ongoing research in the realm of emerging information technology, offering novel perspectives on how information technology affordances influence user responses
Action (physics) · Affordance · Generative grammar · Mechanism (biology) · Mediation · AI in Service Interactions · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Gamification in the Workplace
Consumers and Artificial Intelligence
Common method biases in behavioral research
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM
Self-Reports in Organizational Research
Why do graduate students use generative AI in thesis writing? the influence of self-efficacy, time pressure, and trust
The actualization of meta affordances
Effects of feedback design and dispositional goal orientations on volunteer performance in citizen science projects
Is ChatGPT scary good? How user motivations affect creepiness and trust in generative artificial intelligence
Is Chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment
Motivational determinants of continuance usage intention for generative AI
Ai in e-learning
LLM-mediated domain-specific voice agents
Understanding students’ adoption of the ChatGPT chatbot in higher education
What predicts patients’ satisfaction and continuous use of intelligent medical guidance? the moderating effect of consulting experience
Can AI chatbots help retain customers? An integrative perspective using affordance theory and service-domain logic
Design affordance in VR and customization intention
Empathetic Large Language Models, the social capacities and human flourishing
Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT
Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution
Smartphone and self-extension
I miss my mobile phone!”
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things
Extended Self in a Digital World
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |