Mining Facebook data for Quality of Life assessment
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21452995 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Davide Marengo (0000-0002-7107-0810, University of Turin), Danny Azucar (0000-0003-2513-3283, University of Turin, autor correspondente), Claudio Longobardi (0000-0002-8457-6554, University of Turin), Michele Settanni (0000-0001-9115-4555, University of Turin) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 597-607 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-04-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Behaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0144929x.2019.1711454 |
| OpenAlex | W3001994893 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 56 |
Research indicates that how individuals utilise language to express themselves reflects individual-level differences regarding psychosocial characteristics, including perceived Quality of Life (QoL). In this study, we apply a language modelling technique to the natural user-generated language from Facebook to examine associations between language expressed on Facebook and self-reported QoL. Specifically, we collected the user-generated language from a sample of 603 Facebook users (76.3% females), mined emerging text corpora using the LIWC closed-vocabulary approach, and examined associations between LIWC features and self-reported domain-specific QoL (Physical, Psychological, Social), and General QoL. In line with previous research, we found use of pronouns, negative emotions, death and sleep words, and use of profanity to be significantly associated with QoL. Next, we used the Random Forest algorithm to test the predictability of QoL dimensions based on LIWC features and posting activity statistics. The models achieved moderate predictive power (r ranging from .22 to .33), the Psychological and General QoL dimensions showing the highest accuracy. An alternative approach combining LIWC features, posting activity, and predicted scores for domain-specific QoL components showed increased accuracy when predicting General QoL (r = .43). Findings are discussed in light of previous literature. Suggestions for improving models in future studies are provided
Developmental psychology · Linguistics · Predictability · Predictive power · Psychosocial · Psychotherapist · Quality of life (healthcare) · Random forest · Statistics · Vocabulary · Applied Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Mental Health via Writing · Psychology · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students
Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media
Twitter versus Facebook
To Explain or to Predict?
Happy People Live Longer
Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media
Exercise and well-being
Controlling the False Discovery Rate
Random Forests
Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults
Reading Between the Lines
Living in the Past, Present, and Future
Smartphone Sensors for Monitoring Cancer-Related Quality of Life
Assessing quality of life using WHOQOL-BREF
Advancing Health Outcomes Research Methods and Clinical Applications
Usefulness of the SF-8TM Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions
Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences
The pragmatics of swearing
Sounds like a narcissist
Personality in 100,000 Words
Developing a National Index of Subjective Wellbeing
Talking facilitates cognitive–emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor
Automatic personality assessment through social media language
Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events
Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle
Life course influences on quality of life in early old age
Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |