The association between perceived coercion on admission and formal coercive practices in an inpatient psychiatric setting

Involuntary care is a feature of mental health services around the world. In addition to involuntary admission and treatment, specific coercive practices include seclusion and physical restraint. Our study aimed to determine the relationships, if any, between these practices and perceived coercion on admission among psychiatry inpatients in Ireland, as well as any relationships between perceived coercion on admission and variables such as age, gender and diagnosis. We included 107 psychiatry inpatients aged 18 years or over who were admitted to the acute psychiatry admission units in Tallaght University Hospital and Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period between September 2017 and February 2020. Over a quarter (27.1%) of participating patients had involuntary status; nine (8.4%) had experienced at least one episode of seclusion, and ten (9.3%) had experienced at least one episode of restraint. Perceived coercion on admission was significantly associated with involuntary status and female gender; perceived negative pressures on admission were significantly associated with involuntary status and positive symptoms of schizophrenia; perceived procedural injustice on admission was significantly associated with fewer negative symptoms, involuntary status, cognitive impairment and female gender; and negative affective reactions to hospitalisation on admission were significantly associated with birth in Ireland and being employed. Total score across these four subscales was significantly associated with involuntary status and positive symptoms, and had borderline significant associations with birth in Ireland, being employed and female gender. Overall, perceived coercion on admission, assessed in retrospect by the patient, is more closely associated with involuntary status and symptoms than it is with subsequent formal coercive practices, such as seclusion and restraint. The role of gender merits particular attention in future research, especially in relation to procedural injustice on admission and perceived coercion on admission

Forensic psychiatry · Involuntary commitment · Involuntary treatment · Mental health · Psychiatry · Seclusion · Child Abuse and Trauma · Clinical Psychology · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Psychiatric care and mental health services

• Experiences of coercion amongst involuntary mental health care users in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  Open Access•Zinhle Shozi, Shamima Saloojee et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  Incluir item

• The Mini‐Mental State Examination

  Open Access•Tom N Tombaugh, Nancy J McIntyre•Journal of the American…•1992

  Incluir item

• “Mini-mental state”

  Open Access•Marshal F Folstein, Susan E Folstein et al.•Journal of Psychiatric Research•1975

  Incluir item

• Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research

  Open Access•Lawrence A Palinkas, Sarah Mccue Horwitz et al.•Administration and Policy in…•2015

  Incluir item

• Patient perspectives and the risk of compulsory admission

  Open Access•Louk FM van der Post, Jaap Peen et al.•International Journal of Social…•2014

  Incluir item

• A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Experience with Rating of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale

  Open Access•I H Monrad, Ove Sonesson et al.•Community Mental Health Journal•2016

  Incluir item

• Clinical and demographic differences between voluntary and involuntary psychiatric admissions in a university hospital in Brazil

  Open Access•Tais Michele Minatogawa Chang, Luiz Kobuti Ferreira et al.•Cadernos de Saude Publica•2013

  Incluir item