Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Are All Laws of Nature Created Equal? Meta-laws Versus More Necessary Laws

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21461661
AutoresSalim Hirèche (0000-0002-2698-7267, University of Geneva), Niels Linnemann (0000-0002-3695-8611, University of Geneva), R Michels (0000-0003-4982-7239, University of Lisbon, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Volume90
Fascículo3
Páginas1041-1059
Data de publicação2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoErkenntnis (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0165-0106 • E-ISSN: 1572-8420
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10670-023-00739-7
PMID40124305
OpenAlexW4386511631
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas21

Two approaches to elevating certain laws of nature over others have come to prominence recently. On the one hand, according to the meta-laws approach, there are meta-laws, laws which relate to laws as those laws relate to particular facts. On the other hand, according to the modal , or non-absolutist , approach, some laws are necessary in a stricter sense than others. Both approaches play an important role in current research, questioning the ‘orthodoxy’ represented by the leading philosophical theories of natural laws—Humeanism, the DTA view, dispositional essentialism and primitivism. This paper clarifies the relations between these two emerging approaches, as well as their applicability to physical laws and the status of the challenges they pose for standard theories of laws of nature. We first argue that, despite some significant similarities between the two approaches (especially in the context of Lange’s counterfactual account of laws), they are in general distinct and largely independent of each other. Then, we argue that the support for meta-laws from physical theory and practice is more questionable than usually presented

Counterfactual thinking · Epistemology · Essentialism · Natural law · Physical law · Political science · Sociology · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Laws of Nature

    Open Access•John W Carroll•Laws of Nature•1994

  • Laws and Lawmakers Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature

    Marc Lange•Laws and lawmakers•2009

  • What is a Law of Nature?

    Open Access•D M Armstrong•What Is a Law of Nature?•1983

  • Nature's Metaphysics

    Anthony Bird, Alexander Bird•Nature's Metaphysics•2007

  • The Varieties of Necessity

    Kit Fine•Conceivability and possibility•2002

  • The Nature of Laws

    Open Access•Michael Tooley•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1977

  • The Metaphysics Within Physics

    Tim Maudlin•METAPHYSICS WITHIN PHYSICS.•2007

  • Which symmetry? Noether, Weyl, and conservation of electric charge

    Open Access•Katherine Brading, Katherine A Brading•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2002

  • Laws and meta-laws of nature

    Open Access•Marc Lange•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2007

  • The strong arm of the law

    Open Access•Salim Hirèche, Niels Linnemann et al.•Synthese•2021

  • What Everyone Should Say about Symmetries (and How Humeans Get to Say It)

    Open Access•Michael Townsen Hicks•Philosophy of Science•2019

  • Laws of Nature

    Open Access•Fred I Dretske, Fred Dretske•Philosophy of Science•1977

  • Lange’s Challenge

    Zanja Yudell•The British Journal for the…•2013

  • Symmetry and the Metaphysics of Physics

    Open Access•David John Baker•Philosophy Compass•2010

  • The Modal Status of Laws

    Tuomas E Tahko•The Philosophical Quarterly•2015

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae