Million dollar questions
Why deliberation is more than information pooling
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21470597 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel Hoek (0000-0002-5331-2409, Virginia Tech), R Bradley (0000-0003-2184-7844, London School of Economics and Political Science, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Fascículo | 3-4 |
| Páginas | 581-600 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Choice and Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0176-1714 • E-ISSN: 1432-217X |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00355-022-01392-9 |
| OpenAlex | W4221026869 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
Models of collective deliberation often assume that the chief aim of a deliberative exchange is the sharing of information. In this paper, we argue that an equally important role of deliberation is to draw participants’ attention to pertinent questions, which can aid the assembly and processing of distributed information by drawing deliberators’ attention to new issues. The assumption of logical omniscience renders classical models of agents' informational states unsuitable for modelling this role of deliberation. Building on recent insights from psychology, linguistics and philosophy about the role of questions in speech and thought, we propose a different model in which beliefs are treated as answers directed at specific questions. Here, questions are formally represented as partitions of the space of possibilities and individuals’ information states as sets of questions and corresponding partial answers to them. The state of conversation is then characterised by individuals’ information together with the questions under discussion, which can be steered by various deliberative inputs. Using this model, deliberation is then shown to shape collective decisions in ways that classical models cannot capture, allowing for novel explanations of how group consensus is achieved
Conversation · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Management science · Political science · Pooling · Sociology · Computer Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
Rational Consensus in Science and Society
The Interactive Stance
Inquisitive Semantics
Context
Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality
Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning
The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
Information structure in discourse
The Erotetic Theory of Reasoning
Revising incomplete attitudes
Belief as Question‐Sensitive
Junk Beliefs and Interest‐Driven Epistemology
Deliberation, Single-Peakedness, and the Possibility of Meaningful Democracy
Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice
Game Theory, Information, and Deliberative Democracy
Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy
Considered Opinions
Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty, and Voting Rules
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |