Religious views on the origin and meaning of Covid-2019
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21492666 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tanya Pieterse (0000-0002-8981-1349, University of South Africa), Christina Landman (0000-0002-8905-0738, University of South Africa) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 77 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-03-16 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0259-9422 • E-ISSN: 2072-8050 |
| Editora | AOSIS (PUBLISHER • ZA) |
| DOI | 10.4102/hts.v77i3.6283 |
| OpenAlex | W3134848092 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 18 |
For ages, natural disasters, war and disease have been part of life, sharing themes of not only adversity, fear and death, but also hope. The year 2020 brought a new threat in the form of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which challenged what humankind understood of all they knew and believed. The significant difference today is the role of the media in sharing news and opinions on this disease that threatens not only lives, but also spiritual well-being. In this study, we focus on people’s religious views on the origin and meaning of this invisible threat to establish how this pandemic impacts on people’s belief systems. The 20th century was marked by a shift whereby actions and events are intellectualised to rationalise cause and effect, and the philosophical theodicies are regarded to limit our critical reasoning. This study, however, shows that COVID-19 reactivates this debate in that it surpasses logic and rational thinking. Data are collected by means of comments, discussions and opinions shared on numerous social media platforms. During times of adversity, the same rhetorical ‘who’ and ‘why’ questions are asked and in this regard, theodicy as a philosophical framework informs this study. Applying a narrative inquiry, data are interpreted and three themes are identified, namely COVID-19 is an act God, COVID-19 has nothing to do with God and God remains in control amidst a devastating pandemic. The sample for this study is random and the medium used allows for representativity in terms of age group (18+), gender, race, religious affiliation of South Africa, but not limited to this country. Contribution: This article provides insight into renewed debates on religious views on pandemics and suffering in the context of COVID-19. It contributes to an understanding of different perceptions on the origin of this disease, how people make sense and find meaning in being part of a global discourse
Disease · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Linguistics · Narrative · Nothing · Pandemic · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Theodicy · Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies · Medicine · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Researching Religion and the Covid-19 Pandemic in Africa
Sanitation, vaccination, and sanctification
Critical Investigation on the Pandemic from the Islamic Perspective
Understanding Covid-19 in Disaster Perspective Based on the Tatsunami Manuscript Kyai Haji Maimun Zubair
Spirituality and survivorship
Addressing physical pain with religion and spirituality during and after the Covid-19 pandemic
Preaching the pandemic
Being human in the time of Covid-19
Handbook of Narrative Inquiry
Befriending Job
Narrative Inquiry
Disasters
Perspectives Emerged from Students and Supervisory Staff Interaction in Drug Use Prevention
The Bible, theodicy and Christian responses to historic and contemporary earthquakes and volcanic eruptions
Theodicy at the margins
Pathways in Theodicy
Reconsidering the concept of theodicy in the context of the post-2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami
Evil and Human Suffering in Islamic Thought-Towards a Mystical Theodicy
Hard Lessons Learned
The Problem of Suffering and the Sociological Task of Theodicy
| Citações por ano | 1,4 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Altamente citado | Não |