‘Joining the dots’ and addressing the challenges with Greater Manchester's modern slavery and human trafficking (MSHT) partnerships approach
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21497828 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jon Davies (0000-0002-4561-1839, The University of Manchester, autor correspondente), Robin Broad (0000-0001-9197-9901, University of Manchester), Rose Broad (The University of Manchester), Tomáš Diviák (0000-0001-7239-8466, The University of Manchester), Celine Giese (0009-0006-2679-2140, The University of Manchester), D Gadd (0000-0002-0362-7648, The University of Manchester), Siân Payne (Greater Manchester Combined Authority) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-06-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Probation Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0264-5505 • E-ISSN: 1741-3079 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02645505261453306 |
| OpenAlex | W7164561324 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
Modern slavery and human trafficking (MSHT) continue to present complex challenges internationally and in the United Kingdom, especially when intersecting with migration systems, labour markets, criminal justice and welfare regimes. This article presents the first comprehensive review of MSHT partnerships in the city-region of Greater Manchester, which has aspects of devolved governance and a well-established culture of cross-sector collaboration. Drawing on qualitative interviews, a practitioner survey and social network analysis, we examine how statutory bodies and NGO/charity organisations coordinate their responses to MSHT, as well as the overlapping areas of homelessness, migration and asylum. Our findings show a broadly cohesive and collaborative partnership landscape, yet one that is held back by the absence of a longer-term vision and governance strategy, lack of resources, inconsistent survivor support and limited private sector engagement. We argue that meaningful MSHT responses and partnerships require not only inter-organisational cooperation, but also clear strategic direction, sustainable investment, and more consistent involvement and acknowledgement of people with lived experience. The article provides evidence-based recommendations to strengthen city-region MSHT partnerships and contributes wider insights for multi-organisational approaches to exploitation
Acknowledgement · Corporate governance · Criminal justice · Economic Justice · General partnership · Human trafficking · Statutory law · Voluntary sector · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Mining and Resource Management · Sex work and related issues
The Organisation of Crime and Harm in the Construction Industry
Human Trafficking
Social Network Analysis
A critical perspective on the administrative approach to crime prevention
Demystifying Modern Slavery
Criminological Research
Monitoring and Evaluation of Human Trafficking Partnerships in England and Wales
Policy and Practice
Protection and support for survivors of modern slavery in the UK
An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Modern Slavery, Multiple Streams Approach and Multilayer Policy Implementation
A really hostile environment’
Performing 'Initial Assessment
Troubling recognitions in British responses to modern slavery
Factors, Counter-Trafficking Programs, and Geographical Variations in Human Trafficking Literature (2010–2022)
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Participatory action research
A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research
When Victims of Modern Slavery Became Offenders
Recognizing Modern Slavery
Traits of Transformative Anti-Trafficking Partnerships
Criminalising survivors of modern slavery
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |