The Apple of Kant's Ethics
I‐Maxims as the Locus of Assessment
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21507871 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Samuel Kahn (0000-0001-6597-7646, Department of Philosophy Indiana University‐Purdue University Indianapolis, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 104 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 559-577 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Pacific philosophical quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0279-0750 • E-ISSN: 1468-0114 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/papq.12422 |
| OpenAlex | W4285031642 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
I want to distinguish between maxims at three levels of abstraction. At the first level are what I shall call individual maxims, or i‐maxims: maxim tokens as adopted by particular rational beings. At the second level are abstract maxims, or a‐maxims: abstract principles distinct from any individual who adopts them. At the third level are maxim kinds, or k‐maxims: sets of various action‐guiding principles that are grouped on the basis of their content. In this paper, I argue for the thesis that i‐maxims are the locus of assessment in Kant's ethics
Epistemology · Linguistics · Maxim · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
Kant's Theory of Freedom
The Importance of What We Care About
Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness
Kant's Ethical Thought
Obligatory Actions, Obligatory Maxims
Do we Always Act on Maxims
Kant’s Contradiction in Conception Test
Kant's Theory of Morals
Kantian Ethics, Animals, and the Law
Lectures on the history of moral philosophy
Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |