Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Regulatory and legal frameworks recommendations for short sea shipping maritime autonomous surface ships

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21521847
AutoresYaseen Adnan Ahmed (0000-0002-2324-2075, University of Strathclyde, autor correspondente), Gerasimos Theotokatos, Γεράσιμος Θεοτοκάτος (0000-0003-3547-8867, University of Strathclyde), Ilia Maslov (0000-0003-0344-4718, Bureau Veritas (France)), Lars Andreas Lien Wennersberg (0000-0002-4090-3699, SINTEF), Dag Atle Nesheim (0000-0003-2224-7517, SINTEF)
Ano2024
Volume166
Páginas106226
Data de publicação2024-08-01
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMarine Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0308-597X • E-ISSN: 1872-9460
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106226
OpenAlexW4399424073
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas9

This study aims to provide recommendations for addressing the gaps in the existing regulatory and legal frameworks , including the international and national regulations, rules, and standards for developing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASSs) for the Short Sea Shipping (SSS). T he methodological approach consists of the following steps: analysing the characteristics of case-specific MASS and its operating areas for SSS; thoroughly reviewing the existing regulatory and legal frameworks to identify gaps; classifying the gaps based on severity levels (high, moderate, or low); assessing the outlook and usage of potential Key Enabling Technologies (KETs), and offering recommendations through four alternative approaches - interpretation, amendment, new development, or maintaining existing ones. This study deals with MASSs of various Autonomy Levels (ALs), retaining human involvement via consideration of Remote Control Centre (RCC). The obtained results for the use case demonstrate that 62%, 12%, 6% and 5% of the identified gaps pertain to SOLAS , COLREG, STCW and ICLL conventions, respectively. Moreover, 10%, 55%, and 26% of the gaps are categorised as high, moderate, and low severity, with 9% of the gaps addressable through proper justification without requiring amendments. Many of the moderately severe gaps can be mitigated by considering the use of KETs; highly severe gaps necessitate exemptions or bilateral/multilateral agreements, whereas low severity gaps require clarification or definitions amendments. This study provides insights to policymakers for systematically amending the frameworks and preparing the MASS code required for the design, testing and operation of the MASSs for SSS

Business · International trade · Marine engineering · Maritime industry · Engineering · Maritime Navigation and Safety · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Geology · Oceanography

  • Challenges and AI-driven solutions in maritime search and rescue planning

    Open Access•Kemal Ihsan Kilic, Samir Maity et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • The international legal status of the unmanned maritime vehicles

    Open Access•Yen-Chiang Chang, Chao Zhang et al.•Marine Policy•2020

Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2025 (1)
Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae