Technological accident, community class-action litigation, and scientific damage assessment
A case study of court-ordered research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2155185 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J Steven Picou (University of South Alabama), Donald D Rosebrook (Endo Pharmaceuticals (United States)) |
| Ano | 1993 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 117-138 |
| Data de publicação | 1993-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociological Spectrum (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0273-2173 • E-ISSN: 1521-0707 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02732173.1993.9982019 |
| OpenAlex | W2091254599 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 12 |
| Referências citadas | 14 |
A train carrying various regulated hazardous and toxic chemical commodities derailed in Livingston, Louisiana, on September 28, 1982. The resulting fires and explosions necessitated a 14‐day evacuation of over 3,000 residents and precipitated a class‐action lawsuit against the railroad. The court ordered, on its behalf, an independent assessment of the ecological, physical, economic, sociological, and psychological damages resulting from the derailment and subsequent events. These assessments, delayed by legal appeals, began in December 1983 and continued until February 1985. The ecological damage assessment was accomplished by general and quality assurance audits of the records of the railroad's cleanup contractor with the cooperation of the railroad and its contractor and by reviewing the records of the Louisiana health and environmental agencies. The economic, sociological, and psychological damage assessments were accomplished using a common survey instrument administered to a statistically chosen sample of the evacuated residents. The studies showed that the physical damage was surprisingly small, considering the magnitude of the event; evacuated residents were significantly stressed; and there were negative social impacts. After a tentative settlement was reached, the findings of the court's experts were released through participation in a unique court hearing utilizing a panel discussion under oath, with panel members subject to cross‐examination. This procedure resulted in a final settlement agreement, which was informed by an interdisciplinary scientific damage assessment
Audit · Business · Class action · Damages · Forensic engineering · Lawsuit · Political science · Engineering · Law · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Risk and Safety Analysis · Accounting
Disaster, Litigation, and the Corrosive Community
Coping with technological disaster
Contemporary Conceptions of Environmental Risk
The “Talking Circle” as Sociological Practice
Mitigating Litigating
Weight and weightlessness
Technological disaster and chronic community stress
Sociology and the environment
Technological Disasters, Litigation Stress, and the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Communities, Policy and Chronic Technological Disasters
Economic impact of an environmental accident
Secondary Trauma or Secondary Disaster? Insights From Hurricane Katrina
Handbook of Environmental Sociology
The psychological effects of ionizing radiation
No Safe Place
Love Canal
Psychosocial Effects of Hazardous Toxic Waste Disposal on Communities
Everything in Its Path
No Safe Place
Attitudes and Stress in the Presence of Technological Risk
The Impacts of an Oil Spill
Social disruption and the Valdez oil spill
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,36 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1993 - 2018 (26) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |