Comparative Approaches to Visions of Community
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2156348 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christina Lutter (0000-0002-6775-9658, Moscow State University of Technologies and Management named after K.G. Razumovskiy, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 129-143 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | History and Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0275-7206 • E-ISSN: 1477-2612 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02757206.2014.930738 |
| OpenAlex | W2033556175 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
The aims of the first VISCOM conference were to compare different methods employed in the study of community to address new methodological perspectives for the analysis of categories of identification and belonging, the conditions and processes of the making of communities across large cultural and geo-political fields. At the same time, this exchange was meant to provide thorough reflections on the process of comparative research itself. This contribution sets out to discuss the diversity and creative tension of these methodological approaches before proceeding to outline how they may contribute to future collaboration both within the VISCOM project and beyond in interdisciplinary and, eventually, in transdisciplinary collaboration between historians and socio-anthropologists. The text thus focuses on the methodological tools and the very practical research processes addressed at the conference and in the case studies brought together in this thematic issue. It will specifically address the challenge to develop comparable, but contextually differentiated approaches to different types and amounts of medieval source material across time and space, viewing the methodological and conceptual framework of the project and the contributions of this issue as a toolbox. I will thus take up the claims of several contributors to more thoroughly contextualise the very conceptual notions underlying our research (such as identity, ethnicity and community) and argue in favour of a less "loaded" and more flexible conceptual vocabulary developed in close relation with the source material to cope with the high diversity of sources and methodological approaches
Aesthetics · Conceptual framework · Data science · Diversity (politics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Identification (biology · Identity (music · Linguistics · Management science · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Social science · Sociology · Toolbox · Vision · Vocabulary · Anthropology · Computer Science · Historical Art and Culture Studies · Medieval Literature and History · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
The Symbolic Construction of Community
Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe
Is Science Multicultural?
Ethnic groups and boundaries
The ethnic origins of nations
Introduction — Strategies of Identification
Telling the Difference
From the “Good Tradition” to Religion on Some Basic Aspects of Religious Conversion in Early Medieval Tibet and the Comparative Central Eurasian Context
The Interpretation of Cultures
Imagined communities
Fear
Culture through Time
The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy
Comparing Communities-The Limits of Typology
Power and Ethnicity History and Anthropology
Pars Pro TotoObservation
Lex alterius
Multiple Histories
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2021 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |