Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

From Personal Network to Institution Building

The Lifanyuan, Gift Exchange and the Formalization of Manchu-Mongol Relations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2156359
AutoresDorothea Heuschert-Laage (0009-0009-6121-8023, North-West State Technical University, autor correspondente)
Ano2014
Volume25
Fascículo5
Páginas648-669
Data de publicação2014-10-20
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHistory and Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0275-7206 • E-ISSN: 1477-2612
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02757206.2014.946022
OpenAlexW2022145120
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas29

The Qing emperors, who ruled over China from 1644 to 1911, managed to bring large parts of Inner Asia under their control and extended the territory of China to an unprecedented degree. This paper maintains that the political technique of patronage with its formalized language, its emphasis on gift exchange and expressions of courtesy is a useful concept for explaining the integration of Inner Asian confederations into the empire. By re-interpreting the obligations of gift exchange, the Qing transformed the network of personal relationships, which had to be reinforced and consolidated permanently, into a system with clearly defined rules. In this process of formalization, the Lifanyuan, the Court for the Administration of the Outer Regions, played a key role. While in the early years of the dynasty, it was responsible for collecting and disseminating information concerning the various patronage relationships with Inner Asian leaders, over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries its efforts were directed at standardizing and streamlining the contacts between ethnic minorities and the state. Through the Lifanyuan, the rules and principles of patronage were maintained in a modified form even in the later part of the dynasty, when the Qing exercised control in the outer regions more directly. The paper provides an explanation for the longevity and cohesiveness of the multi-ethnic Qing Empire. Based on recently published Manchu and Mongol language archival material and the Maussian concept of gift exchange, the study sheds new light on the changing self-conception of the Qing emperors

China · Courtesy · Empire · Ethnic group · Institution · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law

  • Contesting the Confucian peace

    Open Access•Andrew Phillips•European Journal of International…•2018

  • Cherishing Men from Afar

    James L Hevia•Cherishing Men from Afar•1995

  • Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History

    Nicola Di Cosmo, Don J Wyatt•Political Frontiers, Ethnic…•2005

  • Manchu-Mongol Relations on the Eve of the Qing Conquest

    Nicola Di Cosmo, Dalizhabu Bao•Manchu-Mongol Relations on the…•2003

  • The Culture of Giving

    Open Access•Ilana Krausman Ben-Amos, Ilana Krausman Ben‐Amos•Culture of Giving•2008

  • Constructing Suiyuan

    Justin Tighe•Constructing Suiyuan•2005

  • Our Great Qing

    Johan Elverskog•Our Great Qing•2017

  • China Marches West

    Open Access•Peter C Perdue•China Marches West•2005

  • Social Solidarity and the Gift

    Open Access•Aafke Komter, Aafke E Komter•Social Solidarity and the Gift•2004

  • The Gift

    Marcel Mauss•Gift•2002

  • Historical Anthropology in Eurasia “… and the Way Thither”

    Dittmar Schorkowitz•History and Anthropology•2012

  • Patronage in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France

    Adrian Armstrong•Sixteenth Century Journal•2003

  • Why Did the Kangxi Emperor Go to Wutai Shan

    Natalie Köhle•Late imperial China•2008

  • Worshiping Grace

    Christopher P Atwood•Late imperial China•2000

  • The Lifanyuan and the Inner Asian Rituals in the Early Qing (1644-1795)

    Ning Chia, Chia Ning•Late imperial China•1993

  • China's Last Empire

    Jeremiah Jenne•The Chinese Historical Review•2010

  • China and Other Colonial Empires

    Peter C Perdue•Journal of American-East Asian…•2009

  • Legal Pluralism in the Qing Empire

    Dorothea Heuschert•The International History Review•1998

  • Emperor as Bodhisattva in The Governance of The Ch'ing Empire

    David M Farquhar, David Μ Farquhar•Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies•1978

  • The Modern History of Mongolia

    Geoffrey Wheeler•International Affairs•1969

  • Patrons, Clients, and Empire

    C W Newbury, Colin Newbury•Patrons, clients, and empire•2003

  • Patronage in Early Modern France

    Sharon Kettering•French Historical Studies•1992

  • Gifts, commodities, and social relations

    Open Access•James G Carrier, James Carrier•Sociological Forum•1991

  • Gift-Giving and Patronage in Early Modern France

    Sharon Kettering•French History•1988

  • Manzhou yuanliu kao and the Formalization of the Manchu Heritage

    Open Access•Pamela Kyle Crossley•The Journal of Asian Studies•1987

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,13
Intervalo de citações2018 - 2018 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae