From Personal Network to Institution Building
The Lifanyuan, Gift Exchange and the Formalization of Manchu-Mongol Relations
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2156359 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dorothea Heuschert-Laage (0009-0009-6121-8023, North-West State Technical University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 648-669 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-10-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | History and Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0275-7206 • E-ISSN: 1477-2612 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02757206.2014.946022 |
| OpenAlex | W2022145120 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 29 |
The Qing emperors, who ruled over China from 1644 to 1911, managed to bring large parts of Inner Asia under their control and extended the territory of China to an unprecedented degree. This paper maintains that the political technique of patronage with its formalized language, its emphasis on gift exchange and expressions of courtesy is a useful concept for explaining the integration of Inner Asian confederations into the empire. By re-interpreting the obligations of gift exchange, the Qing transformed the network of personal relationships, which had to be reinforced and consolidated permanently, into a system with clearly defined rules. In this process of formalization, the Lifanyuan, the Court for the Administration of the Outer Regions, played a key role. While in the early years of the dynasty, it was responsible for collecting and disseminating information concerning the various patronage relationships with Inner Asian leaders, over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries its efforts were directed at standardizing and streamlining the contacts between ethnic minorities and the state. Through the Lifanyuan, the rules and principles of patronage were maintained in a modified form even in the later part of the dynasty, when the Qing exercised control in the outer regions more directly. The paper provides an explanation for the longevity and cohesiveness of the multi-ethnic Qing Empire. Based on recently published Manchu and Mongol language archival material and the Maussian concept of gift exchange, the study sheds new light on the changing self-conception of the Qing emperors
China · Courtesy · Empire · Ethnic group · Institution · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law
Cherishing Men from Afar
Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History
Manchu-Mongol Relations on the Eve of the Qing Conquest
The Culture of Giving
Constructing Suiyuan
Our Great Qing
China Marches West
Social Solidarity and the Gift
The Gift
Historical Anthropology in Eurasia “… and the Way Thither”
Patronage in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France
Why Did the Kangxi Emperor Go to Wutai Shan
Worshiping Grace
The Lifanyuan and the Inner Asian Rituals in the Early Qing (1644-1795)
China's Last Empire
China and Other Colonial Empires
Legal Pluralism in the Qing Empire
Emperor as Bodhisattva in The Governance of The Ch'ing Empire
The Modern History of Mongolia
Patrons, Clients, and Empire
Patronage in Early Modern France
Gifts, commodities, and social relations
Gift-Giving and Patronage in Early Modern France
Manzhou yuanliu kao and the Formalization of the Manchu Heritage
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,13 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |