Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Workflow matters

Comparing human translators and multi-agent LLMs in literary translation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21584040
AutoresLulu Wang (0000-0002-6610-860X, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Sanjun Sun (0000-0002-4020-8418, Beijing Foreign Studies University), Xing Wang (0000-0002-3230-3482, Tencent), Jinghang Gu (0000-0002-6335-0433, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Kanglong Liu (0000-0003-3962-2563, Hong Kong Polytechnic University)
Ano2026
Data de publicação2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoTarget International Journal of Translation Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0924-1884 • E-ISSN: 1569-9986
EditoraJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/target.25081.wan
OpenAlexW7163030186
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas37

Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in translation tasks but often struggle with literary texts. This study compares professional human translations with translations produced by two AI-driven systems that coordinate multiple LLM-based agents. The first system mimics professional human translation practice, with distinct drafting and revision phases. The second redesigns the process specifically for LLMs’ capabilities, breaking translation into granular steps with specialized AI agents handling strategic planning, stylistic refinement, and coherence checking. Expert evaluations revealed that both AI systems achieved accuracy comparable to professional human translators. The LLM-capability-driven system produced translations with superior stylistic qualities and poetic language, though it occasionally added extraneous content. Meanwhile, the practice-derived system delivered concise translations but sometimes lacked cohesive flow. Blind evaluations showed that the translations from both AI systems were frequently preferred over human translations, particularly in terms of fluency. This study demonstrates that rethinking translation workflows around LLM capabilities can yield exceptional results, sometimes surpassing human performance in certain aspects

Human language · Machine translation · Workflow · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Translation Studies and Practices

  • Generative Agents

    Open Access•Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien et al.•Proceedings of the 36th Annual…•2023

  • What are the differences? A comparative study of generative artificial intelligence translation and human translation of scientific texts

    Open Access•Linling Fu, Lei Liu•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Machine translation of Chinese classical poetry

    Open Access•Ruiyao Gao, Yumeng Lin et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Creativity in translation

    Open Access•Ana Guerberof-Arenas, Antonio Toral•Translation Spaces•2022

  • Machine translation, ethics and the literary translator’s voice

    Open Access•Don Kenny, Marion Winters•Translation Spaces•2020

  • Style in speech and narration of two English translations of Hongloumeng

    Open Access•Isabelle Chou, Kanglong Liu•Target International Journal of…•2024

  • Ethical issues regarding machine(-assisted) translation of literary texts

    Open Access•Kristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov•Perspectives•2018

  • Different Methods of Evaluating Student Translations

    Open Access•Christopher Waddington•Meta Journal des traducteurs•2002

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae