Workflow matters
Comparing human translators and multi-agent LLMs in literary translation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21584040 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lulu Wang (0000-0002-6610-860X, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Sanjun Sun (0000-0002-4020-8418, Beijing Foreign Studies University), Xing Wang (0000-0002-3230-3482, Tencent), Jinghang Gu (0000-0002-6335-0433, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Kanglong Liu (0000-0003-3962-2563, Hong Kong Polytechnic University) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Target International Journal of Translation Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0924-1884 • E-ISSN: 1569-9986 |
| Editora | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/target.25081.wan |
| OpenAlex | W7163030186 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 37 |
Large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential in translation tasks but often struggle with literary texts. This study compares professional human translations with translations produced by two AI-driven systems that coordinate multiple LLM-based agents. The first system mimics professional human translation practice, with distinct drafting and revision phases. The second redesigns the process specifically for LLMs’ capabilities, breaking translation into granular steps with specialized AI agents handling strategic planning, stylistic refinement, and coherence checking. Expert evaluations revealed that both AI systems achieved accuracy comparable to professional human translators. The LLM-capability-driven system produced translations with superior stylistic qualities and poetic language, though it occasionally added extraneous content. Meanwhile, the practice-derived system delivered concise translations but sometimes lacked cohesive flow. Blind evaluations showed that the translations from both AI systems were frequently preferred over human translations, particularly in terms of fluency. This study demonstrates that rethinking translation workflows around LLM capabilities can yield exceptional results, sometimes surpassing human performance in certain aspects
Human language · Machine translation · Workflow · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Translation Studies and Practices
Generative Agents
What are the differences? A comparative study of generative artificial intelligence translation and human translation of scientific texts
Machine translation of Chinese classical poetry
Creativity in translation
Machine translation, ethics and the literary translator’s voice
Style in speech and narration of two English translations of Hongloumeng
Ethical issues regarding machine(-assisted) translation of literary texts
Different Methods of Evaluating Student Translations
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |