Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Ranking Alternatives from Opinions on Criteria

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21584938
AutoresTakahiro Suzuki (0000-0002-1487-867X, The University of Tokyo, autor correspondente), Stefano Moretti (0000-0003-3627-3257, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Michele Aleandri (0000-0002-5177-8176, Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli)
Ano2026
Volume35
Fascículo1
Data de publicação2026-03-01
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGroup Decision and Negotiation (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0926-2644 • E-ISSN: 1572-9907
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10726-025-09957-6
OpenAlexW4414691893
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas19

A primary challenge in collective decision-making is that achieving unanimous agreement is difficult, even at the level of criteria. The history of social choice theory illustrates this: numerous normative criteria on voting rules have been proposed; however, disagreements persist regarding which criteria should take precedence. This study addresses the problem of ranking alternatives based on the aggregation of opinions over criteria that the alternatives might fulfill. Using the opinion aggregation model, we propose a new rule—termed the Intersection Initial Segment (IIS) rule—and characterize it using five axioms: neutrality, independence of the worst set, independence of the best set, weak intersection very important player, and independence of non-unanimous improvement. We illustrate our approach using a running example in which the objective is to rank voting rules—showing that our opinion aggregation model is particularly well-suited to this context—and that the IIS rule is a counterpart to the method discussed as reported by Nurmi (The choice of voting rules based on preferences over criteria. In: Bogumił Kamiński, Gregory E. Kersten, and Tomasz Szapiro, editors, Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. GDN 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 218:241–252, 2015)

Normative · Social choice theory · Voting · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Multi-Criteria Decision Making

  • Aggregating Opinions on Sets of Alternatives

    Open Access•Takahiro Suzuki•Group Decision and Negotiation•2025

  • A Society Can Always Decide How to Decide

    Open Access•Takahiro Suzuki, Masahide Horita•Group Decision and Negotiation•2023

  • Consistent social ranking solutions

    Open Access•Takahiro Suzuki, Masahide Horita•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Sabotage-proof social ranking solutions

    Open Access•Takahiro Suzuki, Masahide Horita•Theory and Decision•2025

  • Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice

    Open Access•Douglas W Rae•American Political Science Review•1969

Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae