Optimising learning from interactive visualisations with drawing prompts
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21589720 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mike Stieff (0000-0002-1639-891X, Learning Sciences Research Institute University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America, autor correspondente), Katharina Scheiter (0000-0002-9397-7544, University of Potsdam), Shaaron Aınsworth (0000-0002-9453-7196, University of Nottingham) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 786-815 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-04-13 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2024.2430803 |
| OpenAlex | W4405682808 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 39 |
Interactive visualisations (IVs) have demonstrated success for improving learning in science classrooms. However, for this success to be realised, it is important that learners adopt an effective learning strategy. In three studies, we explored if drawing is such a strategy and, if so, what scaffolds might enhance its use. Compared to drawing from written text where almost invariably drawing is helpful, extant research on the efficacy of drawing for promoting learning from IVs is contradictory. Consequently, in Study 1 we first addressed whether drawing with IVs is beneficial by comparing this strategy to summarising when learners studied chemical equilibria with only text or with an IV. As we found drawing with IVs was effective, two subsequent studies explored if this could be further enhanced by scaffolding learners’ drawing by providing structured prompts and example sketches. Contrary to other research, we did not find evidence that these scaffolds further enhanced learning by drawing. These results add important evidence for the efficacy and limitations of drawing for learning with IVs
Extant taxon · Mathematics education · Science education · Science learning · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Multimedia Learning
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models
The Icap Framework
The learning effects of computer simulations in science education
Drawing to Learn in Science
Does Training on Self-Regulated Learning Facilitate Students' Learning With Hypermedia?
Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning
The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving
Sketching, not representational competence, predicts improved science learning
Is drawing after learning effective for metacognitive monitoring only when supported by spatial scaffolds
Self-regulated learning from illustrated text
| Altamente citado | Não |
|---|