Applying Rawls’ Theory of Public Reason to Controversies over Parental Surrogacy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21598518 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jacob M Appel (0000-0003-3523-9145, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 49-60 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0963-1801 • E-ISSN: 1469-2147 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0963180125000015 |
| PMID | 39865848 |
| OpenAlex | W4406848624 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Parental surrogacy remains a highly controversial issue in contemporary ethics with considerable variation in the legal approaches of different jurisdictions. Finding a societal consensus on the issue remains highly elusive. John Rawls’ theory of public reason, first developed in his A Theory of Justice (1971), offers a unifying model of political discourse and engagement that enables reasonable citizens to accept policies that they do not necessarily support at a personal level. The theory established a promising framework for private citizens with distinct moral positions on the subject to find common ground and, in doing so, to negotiate a consensus regarding the degree and nature of regulation that is palatable to all rational citizens
Common ground · Democracy · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethical theory · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public reason · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Philosophy · Reproductive Health and Technologies
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |