Consensus-Driven Priorities for Firearm Injury Education Among Medical Professionals
Dados Bibliográficos
PURPOSE: Firearm injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. However, many medical professionals currently receive minimal or no education on firearm injury or its prevention. The authors sought to convene a diverse group of national experts in firearm injury epidemiology, injury prevention, and medical education to develop consensus on priorities to inform the creation of learning objectives and curricula for firearm injury education for medical professionals. METHOD: In 2019, the authors convened an advisory group that was geographically, demographically, and professionally diverse, composed of 33 clinicians, researchers, and educators from across the United States. They used the nominal group technique to achieve consensus on priorities for health professions education on firearm injury. The process involved an initial idea-generating phase, followed by a round-robin sharing of ideas and further idea generation, facilitated discussion and clarification, and the ranking of ideas to generate a prioritized list. RESULTS: This report provides the first national consensus guidelines on firearm injury education for medical professionals. These priorities include a set of crosscutting, basic, and advanced learning objectives applicable to all contexts of firearm injury and all medical disciplines, specialties, and levels of training. They focus on 7 contextual categories that had previously been identified in the literature: 1 category of general priorities applicable to all contexts and 6 categories of specific contexts, including intimate partner violence, mass violence, officer-involved shootings, peer (nonpartner) violence, suicide, and unintentional injury. CONCLUSIONS: Robust, data- and consensus-driven priorities for health professions education on firearm injury create a pathway to clinician competence and self-efficacy. With an improved foundation for curriculum development and educational program-building, clinicians will be better informed to engage in a host of firearm injury prevention initiatives both at the bedside and in their communities
Curriculum · Health professionals · Injury prevention · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Suicide prevention · Disaster Response and Management · Gun Ownership and Violence Research · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Safety Planning Intervention
Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting
Cure Violence
The Accessibility of Firearms and Risk for Suicide and Homicide Victimization Among Household Members
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research
The Association of American Medical Colleges
Referral to Health and Social Services for Intimate Partner Violence in Health Care Settings
The Mental Health Consequences of Mass Shootings
Provider Screening and Counseling for Intimate Partner Violence
Continuing Medical Education and Firearm Violence Counseling
Identifying high‐risk firearm owners to prevent mass violence
Variation in Rates of Fatal Police Shootings across US States
Removing Guns From Batterers
Quantifying Disparities in Urban Firearm Violence by Race and Place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Consensus methods
The Association Between State Laws Regulating Handgun Ownership and Statewide Suicide Rates
Storage Practices of US Gun Owners in 2016
Purchaser Licensing, Point-of-Sale Background Check Laws, and Firearm Homicide and Suicide in 4 US States, 1985–2017
Costs and Financial Burden of Initial Hospitalizations for Firearm Injuries in the United States, 2006–2014
Legal Liability for Returning Firearms to Suicidal Persons Who Voluntarily Surrender Them in 50 US States
Urban–Rural Differences in Suicide in the State of Maryland
Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non–Gun Owners in 2017
Mass Shootings
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |