Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Labels, Language, and Other Strategies to Improve Communication About Lower Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Theoretical Review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21616288
AutoresSuzanna Apostolovski (0009-0007-6120-9755, University of Toronto, autor correspondente), Nicole J Look Hong (0000-0002-2106-341X, Odette Cancer Centre), Frances C Wright (0000-0003-1904-4997, Odette Cancer Centre), Anna R Gagliardi (0000-0002-5721-809X, University Health Network)
Ano2026
Volume41
Fascículo6
Páginas1094-1104
Data de publicação2026-05-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Communication (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1041-0236 • E-ISSN: 1532-7027
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10410236.2025.2546527
PMID40878233
OpenAlexW4413804249
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas45

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is when abnormal cells are found in the milk ducts of the breast, but they have not spread outside the ducts. It is not an invasive cancer, but it can sometimes turn into cancer over time if not treated. Women with low or intermediate grade DCIS are counseled to undergo standards of care, which may include surgery, radiation, and/or endocrine therapy even though DCIS may not develop into breast cancer, prompting confusion and long-lasting anxiety. The purpose of this study was to identify ideal labels, language, and other strategies to improve communication about DCIS. We conducted a theoretical review of 12 studies published between 2011 and 2022 and analyzed our findings with communication accommodation theory (CAT). Women and clinicians differed in initial orientation and psychological accommodation. Women were confused and anxious because clinicians employed labels such as pre-cancer or stage 0 cancer, but referred to it as "only" DCIS. Women preferred that clinicians refer to "abnormal cells" and distinguish DCIS from invasive breast cancer. In contrast, clinicians incorrectly believed that women understood that pre-cancer or stage 0 cancer distinguished DCIS from invasive breast cancer, and rather than explaining, referred women to other sources of information. However, women and clinicians agreed on several ways to improve communication: approximation (e.g. plain language), interpretability (e.g. visual aids), interpersonal control (e.g. take time to answer questions), discourse management (e.g. discuss risk of spread/recurrence) and emotional expression (e.g. address concerns)

Anxiety · Breast cancer · Cancer · Carcinoma in situ · Ductal carcinoma · Gynecology · Interpersonal communication · Psychiatry · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology · Internal Medicine

  • PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies

    Open Access•Jessie McGowan, Margaret Sampson et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2016

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

  • Recommendations to improve patient‐centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ

    Open Access•Bryanna B Nyhof, Frances C Wright et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • How to practice person‐centred care

    Open Access•Maria J Santana, Maria Santana et al.•Health Expectations•2018

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae