Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How much conflict is too much? How frequent task conflict expressions affect angels’ reinvestment intention

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21620009
AutoresAlexander Narh Tetteh (0000-0002-8378-4984, University of Science and Technology of China), Qingxiong Weng (0000-0002-5426-6029, University of Science and Technology of China), Lincoln Jisuvei Sungu (0000-0002-3746-7996, University of Science and Technology of China), Magdalene Zeinab Akosua Adams (University of Science and Technology of China)
Ano2024
Volume35
Fascículo2
Páginas387-410
Data de publicação2024-02-13
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Journal of Conflict Management (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1044-4068 • E-ISSN: 1758-8545
EditoraEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/ijcma-02-2023-0029
OpenAlexW4387819582
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas84

Purpose The aim of this study is to understand the levels (i.e. mild vs intense) of task conflict (TC) expressions between angel investors and entrepreneurs at the post-investment stage and how it affect angel investors’ follow-on investment intentions with the same entrepreneur. Design/methodology/approach Survey data was gathered from 71 angel investors in China. Mplus was used to test the proposed research model. Findings This study found that angels perceive affective conflict (AC) when engaged in intense TC, unlike the case for mild TC expressions. Furthermore, the analysis shows that, unlike mild TC expressions, intense TC expressions impede angels’ reinvestment intentions when they perceive ACs. Other results indicate that when angels perceive that entrepreneurs are not open to coaching, the prominence of mild TC expression is sharply mitigated and becomes as detrimental as intense TC expressions. Research limitations/implications This study only focused on one specific aspect of the angel–entrepreneur post-investment relationship: The effect of their TC expressions on angels’ reinvestment intentions. By no means do the authors imply that TC expression in the angel–entrepreneur post-investment relationship is the only factor that matters to angel investors in their follow-on investment intentions with the same entrepreneur. Practical implications The findings suggest that entrepreneurs should pay careful attention to TC that may arise between them and their financiers. TCs are not entirely detrimental, but their negative effect might depend on how they are expressed. An appropriate level of TC may also improve enterprise performance and collaboration. Thus, angels and entrepreneurs should set clear goals and performance standards, where task interactions mainly focus on the goals and expected outcomes. Originality/value Prior to this study, little was known about whether all TCs potentially lead to ACs. By distinguishing between levels (i.e. mild vs intense) of TC expressions between angels and entrepreneurs, this study adds a novel aspect to it by showing that TC, in and of itself, does not necessarily lead to AC but can lead to AC once its intensity grows

Coaching · Economics · Management · Political science · Family Business Performance and Succession · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Disruptive talk in online collaborative discussions

    Open Access•Shuang Yu, Junmin Ye et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • Conflict in multi–team systems

    Fengkai YUE, Na Wang et al.•International Journal of Conflict…•2026

  • A multilevel exploration of team conflicts and creativity

    Mostafizur Rahman, Md Mostafizur Rahman et al.•International Journal of Conflict…•2026

  • How venture capitalists evaluate entrepreneurs’ track records of conflicts in investment decisions

    Open Access•Alexander Narh Tetteh, Qingxiong Weng et al.•International Journal of Conflict…•2025

  • The psychological implications of Covid-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences

    Weipeng Lin, Yiduo Shao et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2021

  • The paradox of intragroup conflict

    Frank de Wit, Lindred L Greer et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2012

  • Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction

    Carsten K W De Dreu, Laurie R Weingart•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.

    Michael K Lindell, David J Whitney•Journal of Applied Psychology•2001

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Task conflict and team performance

    Open Access•Eun Kyung Lee, Wonjoon Chung et al.•International Journal of Conflict…•2022

  • Should I Stay or Should I Go

    Open Access•Mahmut Bayazit, Mahmut Bayazıt et al.•Small Group Behavior•2003

  • A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict

    Karen A Jehn•Administrative Science Quarterly•1995

  • Why Differences Make a Difference

    Open Access•Karen A Jehn, Gregory B Northcraft et al.•Administrative Science Quarterly•1999

  • The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes

    Open Access•Karen A Jehn, Lindred L Greer et al.•Group Decision and Negotiation•2008

  • Exploring the Black Box

    Open Access•Lisa Hope Pelled, Kathleen M Eisenhardt et al.•Administrative Science Quarterly•1999

  • Conflict, Learning, and Frustration

    Open Access•Matthew A Cronin, Katerina Bezrukova•SSRN Electronic Journal•2006

  • Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict

    Open Access•Kyoosang Choi, Bongsoon Cho•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2010

  • Decoupling task and relationship conflict

    Open Access•Jixia Yang, Kevin W Mossholder•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2004

  • Rethinking the role of team mindfulness in team relationship conflict

    Open Access•Dan Ni, Xiaoming Zheng et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2021

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano4
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae