Occupational Health of Animal Shelter Employees by Live Release Rate, Shelter Type, and Euthanasia-Related Decision

Dados Bibliográficos

ID2162197
AutoresAllison Andrukonis (0000-0002-4099-5730, Texas Tech University), Alexandra Protopopova (0000-0001-9992-3101, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Canada)
Ano2020
Volume33
Fascículo1
Páginas119-131
Data de publicação2020-01-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAnthrozoös (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0892-7936 • E-ISSN: 1753-0377
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08927936.2020.1694316
OpenAlexW3000661157
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas23

Approximately a quarter of dogs and cats in animal shelters in the United States are euthanized. The stress associated with having to care for animals they subsequently euthanize puts animal shelter workers at a high risk for compassion fatigue, burnout, and even suicide. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between a shelter's Live Release Rate (LRR; defined as the percent of animals that leave the animal shelter with a positive outcome) and the involvement in euthanasia-related decision-making on employees' mental health. An online nationwide survey was administered to 153 municipal and private shelter workers consisting of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the Professional Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Moral Injury Event Scale, and questions relating to their work environment. A multivariate regression model found that compassion satisfaction (p < 0.00001), secondary traumatic stress (p = 0.008), moral injury (p = 0.037), and burnout (p = 0.002) were positively correlated with LRR. This suggests that although job satisfaction is greater in shelters with more positive outcomes, trauma may also be greater. A t-test revealed that employees who euthanize have higher moral injury scores compared with those who do not (t(152) = –2.96, p = 0.0036). A second multivariate regression model found that deciding which animal to euthanize predicted increased secondary traumatic stress (r(151) = –0.058, p = 0.016). Overall, the data show that LRR and decisions surrounding euthanasia play a role in occupational trauma; furthermore, the data provide support for further exploration of moral injury in animal shelter workers

Business · Agriculture and Farm Safety · Medicine · Nursing