Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How Do Clinicians of Different Specialties Perceive and Use Opioid Risk Mitigation Strategies? A Qualitative Study

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21645482
AutoresMichelle S Keller (0000-0002-8157-7586, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, autor correspondente), Alma Jusufagic (University of California, Los Angeles), Teryl K Nuckols (0000-0002-0416-1595, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Jacob Needleman (0000-0002-2875-0589, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Jack Needleman (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Marysue V Heilemann (0000-0001-5490-6076, University of California, Los Angeles)
Ano2021
Volume56
Fascículo9
Páginas1352-1362
Data de publicação2021-07-29
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSubstance Use & Misuse (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1082-6084 • E-ISSN: 1532-2491
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10826084.2021.1926514
PMID34027814
OpenAlexW3165532611
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas40

Background In response to the opioid crisis, states and health systems are encouraging clinicians to use risk mitigation strategies aimed at assessing a patient’s risk for opioid misuse or abuse: opioid agreements, prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), and urine drug tests (UDT). Objective: The objective of this qualitative study was to understand how clinicians perceived and used risk mitigation strategies for opioid abuse/misuse and identify barriers to implementation. Methods: We interviewed clinicians who prescribe opioid medications in the outpatient setting from 2016-2018 and analyzed the data using Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology. Results: We interviewed 21 primary care clinicians and 12 specialists. Nearly all clinicians reported using the PDMP. Some clinicians (adopters) found the opioid agreement and UDTs to be valuable, but most (non-adopters) did not. Adopters found the agreements and UDTs helpful in treating patients equitably, setting limits, and having objective evidence of misuse; protocols and workflows facilitated the use of the strategies. Non-adopters perceived the strategies as awkward, disruptive to the clinician-patient relationship, and introducing a power differential; they also cited lack of time and resources as barriers to use. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that clinicians in certain settings have found effective ways to implement and use the PDMP, opioid agreements, and UDT but that other clinicians are less comfortable with their use. Administrators and policymakers should ensure that the strategies are designed in a way that strengthens the clinician-patient relationship while maximizing safety for patients and that clinicians are adequately trained and supported when introducing the strategies

Business · Early adopter · Family medicine · Medical emergency · Medical prescription · Opioid · Opioid use disorder · Prescription Drug Misuse · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Medicine · Nursing · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

  • Barriers and facilitators related to healthcare practitioner use of real time prescription monitoring tools in Australia

    Open Access•Dimi Hoppe, Chaojie Liu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers

    Johnny Saldaña•The Coding Manual for Qualitative…•2025

  • CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016

    Deborah Dowell, Tamara M Haegerich et al.•JAMA•2016

  • Sampling for qualitative research

    Open Access•Martin Marshall, Martin N Marshall•Family Practice•1996

  • Is Nonconsensual Tapering of High-Dose Opioid Therapy Justifiable

    Open Access•Travis N Rieder•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2020

  • Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research

    O C Robinson•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2013

  • Socioeconomic status, fundamental cause theory, and prescription opioid use behaviors

    Harvey L Nicholson•Sociological Spectrum•2020

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,33
Intervalo de citações2023 - 2023 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae