Engage for Equity

The Role of Trust and Synergy in Community-Based Participatory Research

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21650833
AutoresJulie E Lucero (0000-0003-3874-258X, University of Nevada Reno, NV, USA, autor correspondente), Blake Boursaw (0000-0001-9432-8987, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA), Milton Eder (0000-0002-4036-6491, University of Minnesota), Milton “Mickey” Eder (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Ella Greene-Moton (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), Ella Greene‐Moton (University of Michigan), Nina Wallerstein (0000-0002-1969-0799, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA), John G Oetzel (University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand), John Oetzel (0000-0003-3188-776X, University of Waikato)
Ano2020
Volume47
Fascículo3
Páginas372-379
Data de publicação2020-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Education & Behavior (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1090-1981 • E-ISSN: 1552-6127
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1090198120918838
PMID32437290
OpenAlexW3026093208
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas34
Referências citadas32

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships exist as complex, dynamic relationships that incorporate shared decision that supports trust development between communities and academics. Within CBPR, the interest in understanding the concept of trust has grown with the realization that, without trust, CBPR relationships fracture. A barrier to monitoring the trust health of a partnership is the lack of a shared operationalization of the concept, its antecedents, and measurement tools. To address these barriers, a six-category trust typology was created as a developmental theory of trust progress. To advance the theory, this article reports on the quantitative structural elements of the trust typology, identifies variability in trust correlates, and creates an empirical foundation for the trust types. Using Engage for Equity data, trust covariates included measures of synergy, CBPR principles, participation, and influence. Structural equation models were used to assess associations between trust types and the latent constructs measured by the items in each measure. The findings demonstrate that the six trust types generally operate on a continuum. Specifically, it does appear that trust deficit, role-based trust, functional trust, proxy trust, and reflective trust are on a single continuum from low to high. Scale scores for reflective trust and proxy trust were consistently and statistically significantly higher than those for functional trust, role-based, neutral, and trust deficit. These results support the construct validity of the trust typology as representing “higher levels” of trust phases. Due to the dynamic nature of partnerships, regular monitoring of partnership trust types can serve as a proxy for partnership functioning

Business · Citizen journalism · Community-based participatory research · General partnership · Operationalization · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Structural equation modeling · Typology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology