Stem Cell Research and Biopsychosocial Perspectives From the Sciences, Government, and Community
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2168264 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Darrel Montero (0000-0003-3145-5713, Arizona State University), Connie Forrester (Arizona State University), Traci Grannan (Arizona State University), Lisa Howard (0009-0002-5409-8106, Arizona State University), Priscilla Salas (0000-0002-9649-6543, Arizona State University) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 994-1009 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1091-1359 • E-ISSN: 1540-3556 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10911350903126916 |
| OpenAlex | W2072273517 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
Stem cell research is a fairly new technological advancement that has been accompanied by a wide range of support and scrutiny. On February 22, 1997, Dolly, the sheep, was successfully cloned in Scotland, while controversy erupted over the moral, ethical, and social implications of creating life. Though many agree that using human embryos is morally acceptable, the United States, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, and European countries have passed legislation limiting or prohibiting stem cell research. This article considers the biopsychosocial benefits and potential hazards of stem cell research and how this research may affect social work practice
Biopsychosocial model · Environmental ethics · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Limiting · Political science · Public relations · Scrutiny · Social science · Sociology · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Psychology · Law
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |