Fake or fact? Evaluating chatbots’ performance to help users detect fake news in human-computer communities
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21719087 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Zehang Xie (0000-0003-2665-2640, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Hui Hui (0000-0002-6732-4232, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yunxiang Xie (0009-0006-5268-3693, Quanzhou Vocational and Technical University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-11-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journalism (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1464-8849 • E-ISSN: 1741-3001 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14648849251395797 |
| OpenAlex | W4415967273 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 47 |
The rapid proliferation of fake news poses a significant challenge to information ecosystems, particularly in digital and social media environments. This study investigates the effectiveness of chatbot interventions in assisting users with fake news detection within human-computer communities. Grounded in the Heuristic-Systematic Model, the study employs a 6 (fake news type) × 3 (chatbot intervention strategy) mixed design to examine how different chatbot strategies - fact-checking, contextual explanations, and authority endorsements - affect users’ ability to identify various types of fake news. The results show that fact-checking is most effective for detecting fabrication and photo manipulation, contextual explanations enhance recognition of satire and parody-based fake news, and authority endorsements are particularly useful in countering propaganda. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring chatbot interventions to specific fake news types
Chatbot · Fake news · Psychological intervention · Social media · AI in Service Interactions · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection
Antecedents of Trust and Adoption Intention toward Artificially Intelligent Recommendation Systems in Travel Planning
“Because the News is Depressing as Hell”
Debunking False Information
Designing an XAI interface for BCI experts
Do discussions in human-computer communities trigger group polarization? Insights from the media evocation paradigm
How Satirical News Impacts Affective Responses, Learning, and Persuasion
An Exploratory Study of Fact-Checking Practices in Conflict and Authoritarian Contexts
Selective Use of News Cues
Fake News and The Economy of Emotions
Defining “Fake News”
The Media Trust Gap and Its Political Explanations
Fake News Makes the News
Who Posts Fake News? Authentic and Inauthentic Spreaders of Fabricated News on Facebook and Twitter
Manufacturing Digitalized Soft Propaganda
Why People Rely on Fact-Checkers? Testing Theses of “Perceived Severity of Fake News” and “Disappointment in News Media”
Fact-Checking Misinformation
Fake images
Seeing Is Believing
Nontraditional News Negativity
Anti-intellectualism among US students in journalism and mass communication
Gender in/and the news in the UK and Republic of Ireland
Satirical news from left to right
Perceiving AI intervention does not compromise the persuasive effect of fact-checking
The misinformation recognition and response model
Epistemic authority in the digital public sphere. An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda
Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing
Who Is Spreading AI-Generated Health Rumors? A Study on the Association Between Aigc Interaction Types and the Willingness to Share Health Rumors
Unpacking Multimodal Fact-Checking
Online Social Endorsement and Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United Kingdom
Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing of Specialist Versus Generalist Sources in Online Media
Mobile Persuasion
The role of audience favorability in processing (un)familiar messages
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |