Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Fake or fact? Evaluating chatbots’ performance to help users detect fake news in human-computer communities

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21719087
AutoresZehang Xie (0000-0003-2665-2640, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Hui Hui (0000-0002-6732-4232, Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Yunxiang Xie (0009-0006-5268-3693, Quanzhou Vocational and Technical University, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Data de publicação2025-11-06
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournalism (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1464-8849 • E-ISSN: 1741-3001
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14648849251395797
OpenAlexW4415967273
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas47

The rapid proliferation of fake news poses a significant challenge to information ecosystems, particularly in digital and social media environments. This study investigates the effectiveness of chatbot interventions in assisting users with fake news detection within human-computer communities. Grounded in the Heuristic-Systematic Model, the study employs a 6 (fake news type) × 3 (chatbot intervention strategy) mixed design to examine how different chatbot strategies - fact-checking, contextual explanations, and authority endorsements - affect users’ ability to identify various types of fake news. The results show that fact-checking is most effective for detecting fabrication and photo manipulation, contextual explanations enhance recognition of satire and parody-based fake news, and authority endorsements are particularly useful in countering propaganda. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring chatbot interventions to specific fake news types

Chatbot · Fake news · Psychological intervention · Social media · AI in Service Interactions · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Spam and Phishing Detection

  • Humans incorrectly reject confident accusatory AI judgments

    Open Access•Riccardo Loconte, Merylin Monaro et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2026

  • Antecedents of Trust and Adoption Intention toward Artificially Intelligent Recommendation Systems in Travel Planning

    Open Access•Si Shi, Yuhuang Gong et al.•Travel Research Bulletin•2021

  • “Because the News is Depressing as Hell”

    Ruth Palmer, Stephanie Edgerly•Digital Journalism•2026

  • Debunking False Information

    Open Access•Marju Himma-Kadakas, Indrek Ojamets•Digital Journalism•2022

  • Designing an XAI interface for BCI experts

    Open Access•Sangyeon Kim, Sanghyun Choo et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Do discussions in human-computer communities trigger group polarization? Insights from the media evocation paradigm

    Open Access•Zehang Xie, Shuoshuo Li et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2025

  • How Satirical News Impacts Affective Responses, Learning, and Persuasion

    Open Access•Christian Burgers, Britta C Brugman•Communication Research•2022

  • An Exploratory Study of Fact-Checking Practices in Conflict and Authoritarian Contexts

    Open Access•Samba Dialimpa Badji, Kristin Skare Orgeret et al.•Media and Communication•2024

  • Selective Use of News Cues

    Open Access•Stephan Winter, Miriam J Metzger et al.•Journal of Communication•2016

  • Fake News and The Economy of Emotions

    Vian Bakir, Andrew Mcstay•Digital Journalism•2017

  • Defining “Fake News”

    Edson C Tandoc, Zheng Wei Lim et al.•Digital Journalism•2017

  • The Media Trust Gap and Its Political Explanations

    Open Access•Yufan Guo, Yuzhe Lei•The International Journal of…•2025

  • Fake News Makes the News

    Open Access•Sandrine Boudana, Elad Segev•Journalism Practice•2024

  • Who Posts Fake News? Authentic and Inauthentic Spreaders of Fabricated News on Facebook and Twitter

    Tatiana Dourado•Journalism Practice•2023

  • Manufacturing Digitalized Soft Propaganda

    Kaibin Xu, Yuying He•Journalism Practice•2022

  • Why People Rely on Fact-Checkers? Testing Theses of “Perceived Severity of Fake News” and “Disappointment in News Media”

    Chang Sup Park•Journalism Studies•2023

  • Fact-Checking Misinformation

    Otávio Vinhas, M Bastos•Journalism Studies•2022

  • Fake images

    Open Access•Cuihua Shen, Mona Kasra et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • Seeing Is Believing

    Open Access•Sundar, Maria D Molina et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2021

  • Nontraditional News Negativity

    Lauren Guggenheim, Nayeon Kwak et al.•International Journal of Public…•2011

  • Anti-intellectualism among US students in journalism and mass communication

    Open Access•Michael Mcdevitt, Perry Parks et al.•Journalism•2017

  • Gender in/and the news in the UK and Republic of Ireland

    Open Access•Dawn Wheatley, Karen Ro et al.•Journalism•2024

  • Satirical news from left to right

    Open Access•Britta C Brugman, Christian Burgers et al.•Journalism•2020

  • Perceiving AI intervention does not compromise the persuasive effect of fact-checking

    Open Access•Je Hoon Chae, David Tewksbury•New Media & Society•2024

  • The misinformation recognition and response model

    Open Access•Michelle A Amazeen•Human Communication Research•2023

  • Epistemic authority in the digital public sphere. An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda

    Open Access•Anne Bartsch, Christoph Neuberger et al.•Communication Theory•2024

  • Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing

    Open Access•Doh Shin, Amy Koerber et al.•New Media & Society•2024

  • Who Is Spreading AI-Generated Health Rumors? A Study on the Association Between Aigc Interaction Types and the Willingness to Share Health Rumors

    Open Access•Zehang Xie•Social Media + Society•2025

  • Unpacking Multimodal Fact-Checking

    Open Access•Yingdan Lu, Cuihua Shen•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Online Social Endorsement and Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Andrew Chadwick, Johannes Kaiser et al.•Social Media + Society•2021

  • Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing of Specialist Versus Generalist Sources in Online Media

    Open Access•Yoon Jeon Koh, Sundar et al.•Human Communication Research•2010

  • Mobile Persuasion

    Open Access•Ki Joon Kim, Sundar et al.•Human Communication Research•2016

  • The role of audience favorability in processing (un)familiar messages

    Open Access•Jiyeon So, Jiaying Liu•Human Communication Research•2023

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae