Flood Resilience Quantification Framework of Rural Communities
Case Study of Harlan County, Kentucky
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21738304 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Amanda Melendez (0000-0002-3382-2532, University of Kentucky), Mariantonieta Gutierrez Soto (0000-0003-1609-5801, Pennsylvania State University) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Natural Hazards Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1527-6988 • E-ISSN: 1527-6996 |
| Editora | American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1949 |
| OpenAlex | W4399833292 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 45 |
Communities need to prepare for anticipated hazards, adapt to varying conditions, and resist and recover rapidly from disturbances. Protecting the built environment from natural and human-made hazards and understanding the impact of these hazards helps allocate resources efficiently. Recently, an indicator-based and time-dependent approach was developed for continuously defining and measuring the functionality and disaster resilience at the community level. The PEOPLES framework consists of seven dimensions (population and demographics, environmental and ecosystem, organized governmental services, physical infrastructure, lifestyle and community competence, economic development, and social-cultural capital), and the indicator-based approach finds qualitative characteristics and transforms them into quantitative measures. The proposed framework is used to study the resilience of rural communities subject to flood hazards. Harlan County, Kentucky, in the US Appalachian region is chosen as a case study to evaluate the proposed resilience quantification framework subject to severe flooding. The results show the validity of the proposed approach as a decision-support mechanism to assess and enhance the resilience of rural communities. The novelty of this case study paper is threefold: (1) a holistic indicator-based resilience quantification framework is used, (2) the aim of this study is focused on rural communities, and (3) it offers a unified way of addressing the effects of flood hazards
Archaeology · Community resilience · Environmental planning · Flood myth · Geography · Meteorology · Natural disaster · Water resource management · Disaster Management and Resilience · Engineering · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
State of the research in community resilience
A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities
Post-disaster functional recovery of the built environment
Community Perspectives on Simulation and Data Needs for the Study of Natural Hazard Impacts and Recovery
Hurricane-Induced Biodeterioration of Wood Structures
Fragility and Recovery Models for Energy, Water, and Wastewater Systems for Seismic Regional Risk and Resilience Assessment
The Long-Term Effects of a Coal Waste Disaster on Social Trust in Appalachian Kentucky
Neighbors Helping Neighbors
Assessing the Quality of Rural Hazard Mitigation Plans in the Southeastern United States
Gauging Disaster Vulnerabilities at the Local Level
Urban-Rural Differences in Disaster Resilience
A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience
Understanding the Performance of Historic Masonry Structures in Mayfield, KY after the 2021 Tornadoes
Social Capital and Community Resilience
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |