Destigmatizing Borderline Personality Disorder
A Call to Action for Psychological Science
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21786471 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sara R Masland (0000-0002-6419-4647, Pomona College, autor correspondente), Sarah E Victor (0000-0002-7944-7299, Texas Tech University), Jessica R Peters (0000-0003-3150-3973, Brown University), Skye Fitzpatrick (0000-0002-1347-1827, York University), Katherine L Dixon–Gordon (0000-0002-6962-3121, University of Massachusetts Amherst), Alexandra H Bettis (0000-0002-4442-4951, Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Kellyann M Navarre (0000-0001-6232-8309, Cleveland State University), Shireen L Rizvi (0000-0002-6714-0097, Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 445-460 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Perspectives on Psychological Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1745-6916 • E-ISSN: 1745-6924 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/17456916221100464 |
| PMID | 36054911 |
| OpenAlex | W4294339255 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 141 |
Despite recognition that borderline personality disorder (BPD) is one of the most stigmatized psychological disorders, destigmatization efforts have thus far focused on the views and actions of clinicians and the general public, neglecting the critical role that psychological science plays in perpetuating or mitigating stigma. This article was catalyzed by recent concerns about how research and editorial processes propagate stigma and thereby fail people with BPD and the scientists who study BPD. We provide a brief overview of the BPD diagnosis and its history. We then review how BPD has been stigmatized in psychological science, the gendered nature of BPD stigma, and the consequences of this stigmatization. Finally, we offer specific recommendations for researchers, reviewers, and editors who wish to use science to advance our understanding of BPD without perpetuating pejorative views of the disorder. These recommendations constitute a call to action to use psychological science in the service of the public good
Borderline personality disorder · Call to action · Pejorative · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological science · Psychotherapist · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Social Psychology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury
How mental health care should change as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic
Gender differences in the prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury
“Victim is Not Credible”
Prevalence of Nonsuicidal Self‐Injury in Nonclinical Samples
DSM-IV Personality Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Stigma
Leveraging the Strengths of Psychologists With Lived Experience of Psychopathology
Beyond splitting
Comorbidity and Associated Severity of Borderline Personality Disorder and Physical Health Conditions in a Nationally Representative Sample
Resilience Revisited
Psychoanalytic Investigation of and Therapy in the Border Line Group of Neuroses
Mechanisms of Mental-Health Disparities Among Minoritized Groups
How stigma interferes with mental health care
Mental illness stigma as a mediator of differences in Caucasian and South Asian college students' attitudes toward psychological counseling
A biosocial developmental model of borderline personality
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |