Pandemic control and public evaluation of government performance in Hong Kong
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21790229 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Francis Lee (0000-0003-1587-4950, Chinese University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 284-302 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Chinese Journal of Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1754-4769 • E-ISSN: 1754-4750 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17544750.2022.2052132 |
| OpenAlex | W4223535654 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
The COVID-19 outbreak has presented huge challenges to governments around the world, but it can also be an opportunity for governments to strengthen their performance legitimacy if the pandemic can be controlled. However, the relationship between pandemic control and the public evaluation of government performance might not be straightforward. This essay puts forward a conceptual framework for understanding how a government might or might not benefit from an improvement in a pandemic situation. It distinguishes between retrospective performance evaluation and attitudes toward ongoing preventive measures and highlights the role of responsibility attribution and risk assessment alignment in shaping public opinion. Guided by the framework, this essay discusses the experience of Hong Kong in 2021, where public evaluations of the government remained largely negative despite the lack of serious outbreaks throughout the year
Attribution · Business · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Legitimacy · Management · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public relations · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Medicine · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
Traditional family fertility values and performance evaluation of grassroots governments
Covid-19 Research in Communication Journals
How the politics and policy of Covid-19 response is reshaping and reshaped by identity and citizenship in East Asia
Perceived government-expert discord and evaluation of Covid-19 policies in Hong Kong
National Experiences and Trust in China’s National Government Among Hong Kong Chinese Youth
The use of experts in building political trust
Is Anyone Responsible?
Comparing Pluralist Democracies
A tale of two city-states
When the state fails, bureaucrats and civil society step up
Rethinking ‘risk’ and self-management for chronic illness
The construction and mobilization of political consumerism through digital media in a networked social movement
Policymaking in a low-trust state
Fighting Covid-19 in Hong Kong
The Relevance and Operations of Political Trust in the Covid ‐19 Pandemic
Seeking opportunities from crisis? China’s governance responses to the Covid-19 pandemic
Performance Legitimacy, State Autonomy and China's Economic Miracle
Taking Credit and Avoiding Blame
Listening to the Government
Who's Responsible for the Economy? The Formation and Consequences of Responsibility Attributions
The 2000 US Presidential Election
The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China
Staging environmental risk
Substantive-rational authority
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |