Authorship inequalities in global health research

The IeDEA Southern Africa collaboration

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21879882
AutoresVeronika W Skrivankova (University of Bern), Veronika Skrivankova (0000-0003-0932-4792, University of Bern), Stefanie Hossmann (0000-0003-1600-5925, University of Bern), Morna Cornell (0000-0001-7149-8799, University of Cape Town), Marie Ballif (0000-0003-3133-3011, University of Bern), Carole Dupont (0009-0000-9318-9436, University of Bern), Jacqueline Huwa (0000-0001-8786-2487, Lighthouse Trust), Konstantinos Seintaridis (University of Bern), Thokozani Kalua (0000-0001-7384-9011, Public Health Institute of Malawi), Gilles Wandeler (0000-0002-5278-8763, University of Bern), Reshma Kassanjee (0000-0002-1200-8726, University of Cape Town), Andreas D Haas (0000-0002-4849-181X, University of Bern), Karl‐Günter Technau (0000-0001-7367-7512, University of the Witwatersrand), Karl-Günter Technau (University of the Witwatersrand), Lukas Fenner (0000-0003-3309-4835, University of Bern), Nicholas Low (0000-0003-4817-8986, University of Bern), Mary‐Ann Davies (0000-0001-8496-6475, University of Cape Town, autor correspondente), Mary-Ann Davies (University of Cape Town), Matthias Egger (0000-0002-1791-1842, University of Bern, autor correspondente)
Ano2023
Volume8
Fascículo12
Páginase013316
Data de publicação2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMJ Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2059-7908 • E-ISSN: 2059-7908
EditoraBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013316
PMID38103897
OpenAlexW4389827899
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas23

BACKGROUND: The International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS conducts research in several regions, including in Southern Africa. We assessed authorship inequalities for the Southern African region, which is led by South African and Swiss investigators. METHODS: We analysed authorships of publications from 2007 to 2020 by gender, country income group, time and citation impact. We used 2020 World Bank categories to define income groups and the relative citation ratio (RCR) to assess citation impact. Authorship parasitism was defined as articles without authors from the countries where the study was conducted. A regression model examined the probability of different authorship positions. RESULTS: We included 313 articles. Of the 1064 contributing authors, 547 (51.4%) were women, and 223 (21.0%) were from 32 low-income/lower middle-income countries (LLMICs), 269 (25.3%) were from 13 upper middle-income countries and 572 (53.8%) were from 25 high-income countries (HICs). Most articles (150/157, 95.5%) reporting data from Southern Africa included authors from all participating countries. Women were more likely to be the first author than men (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.83) but less likely to be last authors (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.99). Compared with HIC, LLMIC authors were less likely to publish as first (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.41) or last author (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.42). The proportion of women and LLMIC first and last authors increased over time. The RCR tended to be higher, indicating greater impact, if first or last authors were from HIC (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a global health collaboration co-led by South African and Swiss investigators showed little evidence of authorship parasitism. There were stark inequalities in authorship position, with women occupying more first and men more last author positions and researchers from LLMIC being 'stuck in the middle' on the byline. Global health research collaborations should monitor, analyse and address authorship inequalities

Citation · Citation impact · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Global health · Inequality · Political science · Public health · Publication · Sociology · Demography · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · scientometrics and bibliometrics research