Unraveling the Nexus Between Fiscal Decentralization, Innovation, and Sustainable Economic Performance in China
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22006368 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yongxian Fan (Yunnan University of Finance And Economics), Muhammad Usman (0000-0002-6131-2118, INTI International University, autor correspondente), Yong Wen (Yunnan University of Finance And Economics), Petra Poulova (0000-0001-5269-4065, University of Hradec Králové) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440251411251 |
| OpenAlex | W7124427916 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 66 |
For many years, academics have actively debated the connection between efficiency and fiscal decentralization. The impact of fiscal decentralization and other elements on sustainable economic development has been disregarded in a number of studies. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine how fiscal decentralization affects China’s long-term economic growth from 2005 to 2016, taking into account a number of important control variables. We employ quarterly time series data and suitable econometrics methods (such as Bootstrapped Quantile Regression) for long-run relationships in order to examine the case of the Chinese economy. We also track changes in the variables over time, which is helpful for the empirical evidence. The long-term relationships between the selected variables are validated by the panel cointegration tests. Sustainable economic development is mostly influenced by fiscal decentralization. Using innovation as a control variable helps China’s economy grow. Moreover, the findings verify that financial risk, the interaction of fiscal decentralization and innovation, and the interactive term of fiscal decentralization and financial risk, all lead to a decline in China’s economic progress. These findings appear to have credible policy implications. JEL Classification: E44, Q01, G32, C10
China · Cointegration · Control variable · Decentralization · fiscal federalism · Panel data · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Combining non‐cointegration tests
Human Capital efficiency and equity funds’ performance during the Covid-19 pandemic
A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals
The impact of carbon neutrality on the investment performance
The Dangers of Decentralization
Income Distribution and Macroeconomics
Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship
Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China
Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels
Climate policy uncertainty and world renewable energy index volatility forecasting
A Study on the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Green Development from the Perspective of Government Environmental Preferences
Right person for the right job
Can fiscal decentralisation regulate the impact of industrial structure on energy efficiency
Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth of Vietnamese Provinces
Identifying and disentangling the impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth
Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth
English Question
Regional inequalities, fiscal decentralization and government quality
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth
The economic returns of decentralisation
| Altamente citado | Não |
|---|