Chrysostom’s “ Apatheia of the Angels”

John Chrysostom uses a curious phrase to describe Adam and Eve’s fall in his homilies on Genesis: they lost the “apatheia of the angels” (tōn angelōn tēn apatheian). This suggests that Chrysostom believed that Adam and Eve possessed apatheia before the fall, even in their bodies. He uses the phrase again when writing to Olympias, encouraging the widow to imitate “the apatheia of the angels” as the way to virtue. And again he tells his congregants that monks are an example to them of how to live, as they “imitate the apatheia of the incorporeal powers.” Chrysostom’s understanding of anthropology relies at least in part on his understanding of both angels and ascetism. I argue that Chrysostom thinks that lay Christians have the same potential as monks to become like angels. When Chrysostom tells his congregants to imitate the monks, it is not so they can become like the monks but so that they can become angelic. The “apatheia of the angels” is the blueprint for human life, what humans were made for, and what they aim to be restored to even as they live in the present on earth. Apatheia is a key aspect of Chrysostom’s anthropology

Art · John Chrysostom · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Philosophy

• Demons and the Making of the Monk

  David Brakke•Demons and the Making of the Monk•2006

  Incluir item

• Angels in John Chrysostom’s Anthropology

  Chris L De Wet•Journal of Early Christian History•2020

  Incluir item

• Chrysostom’s Devil

  Robert G T Edwards, Robert Edwards et al.•Augustinian Studies•2021

  Incluir item

• The Monk as Christian Saint and Exemplar in St John Chrysostom’s Writings

  Open Access•Pak-Wah Lai•Studies in Church History•2011

  Incluir item

• Controlling Contested Places

  Christine Shepardson•Controlling Contested Places•2014

  Incluir item