Was the Maternal Health Cash Transfer Programme in Nigeria Sustainable and Cost-Effective

Background: The Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P), Maternal and Child Health (MCH) was introduced by the Nigerian government to increase the use of skilled maternal health services and reduce maternal mortality. The programme, funded out of a reduction in the fuel subsidy, was implemented between October 2012 and April 2015 and incorporated a conditional cash transfer to women to encourage use of facility based maternal services. We seek to assess the incremental cost effectiveness and long term impact of the conditional cash transfer element of the programme. Methods: An impact analysis and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) is undertaken taking a health service perspective towards costs of the intervention. The study was undertaken in Anambra state, comparing areas that received only the investment in health services with areas that implemented the conditional cash transfer programme. An interrupted time series analysis of the programme outputs was undertaken. These were combined with a programme costing to determine the incremental cost per output. Findings: Maternal services provided to patients in conditional cash transfer areas accelerated rapidly from the middle of 2014 until after the programme in late 2015. The costs of providing services in each Primary Health Centre facility was US $52,128 in the areas that only invested in health services compared to US $90,702 in facilities that also provided cash transfers. Much of the additional cost was in managing cash transfers. The incremental cost in the cash transfer areas was $572 for delivery care and $11 for antenatal care. If the programme was to be integrated as a regular service in the public health system, the cost of a delivery is estimated to fall to $389 and to $188 if 2015 levels of activity are assumed. Conclusion: Although the cost of CCTs as originally constituted as a vertical programme are relatively high compared to other similar programmes, these would fall substantially if integrated into the main health system. There is also evidence of sustained impact beyond the end of the funding suggesting that short term programmes can lead to a long-term change in patterns of health seeking behaviour

Business · Cash · Cash transfers · Conditional cash transfer · Cost effectiveness · Cost-effectiveness analysis · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Poverty · Subsidy · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Finance

• The Lancet Nigeria Commission

  Open Access•Ibrahim Abubakar, Sarah L Dalglish et al.•The Lancet•2022

  Incluir item

• Causes of deaths in neonates and children aged 1–59 months in Nigeria

  Open Access•Adeyinka Odejimi, John Quinley et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  Incluir item

• A cost-effectiveness analysis of a South African pregnancy support grant

  Open Access•Aisha Moolla, Winfrida Mdewa et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  Incluir item

• From subsidies to nutrition

  Open Access•Efobi Uchenna, Uchenna Efobi et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  Incluir item

• Conducting Interrupted Time-series Analysis for Single- and Multiple-group Comparisons

  Open Access•Ariel Linden•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2015

  Incluir item

• Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Uptake of Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  Mylene Lagarde, Anna Haines et al.•JAMA•2007

  Incluir item

• Health sector demand-side financial incentives in low- and middle-income countries

  Open Access•Saji S Gopalan, Ronald Mutasa et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2014

  Incluir item