Health quality management practises for cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obesity care in the UAE

A scoping review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID22072908
AutoresZufishan Alam (0000-0002-2668-7360, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Kanika Sinha (Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Fatima AlBedwawi (Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Hanin Osman (Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Md Hafizur Rahman (0000-0002-9633-7075, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Fadumo Abdi Noor (0000-0001-7728-1646, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University), Fadumo Noor, Nazik Nurelhuda (0000-0003-4580-1744, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, autor correspondente)
Ano2026
Volume13
Páginas1703376-1703376
Data de publicação2026-01-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1703376
PMID41602076
OpenAlexW7122359790
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas48

Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes, and obesity, are increasingly prevalent in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), driven by lifestyle changes and demographic shifts. This review maps the current research landscape on health quality management (HQM) practises for the three NCDs in the UAE, uniquely analysed through health quality frameworks. Methods: A scoping review of UAE-based studies and grey literature on HQM for the three NCDs (2015-2025), following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, was conducted. A subsequent focused two-dimensional analysis of interventional studies assessed health quality improvement efforts, incorporating guideline documents and reports for policy context. Findings were analysed using the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six quality domains and the Donabedian model (structure, process, outcomes). Results: Of the identified 549 relevant records, observational studies were predominant, with the majority conducted in larger urban Emirates and focusing on CVD and diabetes. The interventional studies and grey literature documents in the subset analysis largely addressed the effectiveness domain of HQM. Most interventions focused on lifestyle modification through education, digital tools, and multidisciplinary support, with modest clinical improvements observed in most studies. However, study designs were often limited by small sample sizes, the lack of control groups, short durations, and methodological variability. Policy documents emphasised structure and process with limited focus on outcome monitoring. Conclusion: Although intervention research addressing NCDs in the UAE shows promise, it remains methodologically limited and inconsistently distributed across the six HQM domains, with a heavy emphasis on effectiveness and a relative underrepresentation of equity, efficiency, and timeliness, as noted in the reviewed literature. There is a pressing need to implement standardised quality indicators addressing all HQM domains, strengthen cross-sector collaboration, and integrate patient perspectives to translate research progress into equitable, sustainable improvements in NCD care. By integrating health quality frameworks, this review provides a foundation for strengthening NCD care standards in the UAE

Alternative medicine · Health care · MEDLINE · Public health · Quality management · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Primary Care and Health Outcomes